OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PERIOPERATIVE, FUNCTIONAL AND ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES

Background: Renal tumors are increasingly detected early due to widespread imaging. For localized tumors, particularly stage T1, partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard of care, offering oncological efficacy while preservingrenal function. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been increasingly adopted, yet comparative outcomes with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) remain actively evaluated. Aim: To systematically review perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of LPN versus OPN in patients with localized renal tumors, including the impact of tumor anatomical complexity. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed identified comparative studies of LPN versus OPN for T1–T1b renal tumors. Extracted data included operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, renalfunction, oncological outcomes, and tumor complexity assessed by nephrometry scores. Results: LPN showed perioperative advantages, including reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay, with operative time generally comparable to OPN in experienced centers. Early and long-term renal function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, was similar between approaches. Oncological outcomes, including positive surgical margins, recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, were equivalent. In anatomically complex or selected T1b tumors, LPN achieved acceptable perioperative and oncological outcomes when performed in experienced centers. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for localized renal tumors, offering perioperative benefits without compromising renal function or oncological control. Tumor complexity and patient characteristics are more influential determinants of outcomes than surgical approach. LPN should be considered a standard option in centers with expertise in minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4766
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PERIOPERATIVE, FUNCTIONAL AND ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES

Małgorzata Dmochowska, Magdalena Wiśniewska, Julia Hertmanowska, Adrianna Alicja Piekarska et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PERIOPERATIVE, FUNCTIONAL AND ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES

Małgorzata Dmochowska, Magdalena Wiśniewska, Julia Hertmanowska, Adrianna Alicja Piekarska, Gabriela Kryger, Zuzanna Karolina Jędrzejczak, Paweł Jan Babiński, Andrzej Józef Horabik, Krzysztof Chmura, Marta Piotrowska
article en

Abstract

Background: Renal tumors are increasingly detected early due to widespread imaging. For localized tumors, particularly stage T1, partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard of care, offering oncological efficacy while preservingrenal function. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been increasingly adopted, yet comparative outcomes with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) remain actively evaluated. Aim: To systematically review perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of LPN versus OPN in patients with localized renal tumors, including the impact of tumor anatomical complexity. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed identified comparative studies of LPN versus OPN for T1–T1b renal tumors. Extracted data included operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, renalfunction, oncological outcomes, and tumor complexity assessed by nephrometry scores. Results: LPN showed perioperative advantages, including reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay, with operative time generally comparable to OPN in experienced centers. Early and long-term renal function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, was similar between approaches. Oncological outcomes, including positive surgical margins, recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, were equivalent. In anatomically complex or selected T1b tumors, LPN achieved acceptable perioperative and oncological outcomes when performed in experienced centers. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for localized renal tumors, offering perioperative benefits without compromising renal function or oncological control. Tumor complexity and patient characteristics are more influential determinants of outcomes than surgical approach. LPN should be considered a standard option in centers with expertise in minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science(1(49))
St Vincent Hospital (US), Gdynia Maritime University (PL), University Clinical Centre (PL), Szpital Morski im. PCK
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.