Synergy for Poverty Reduction: The Complementary Roles of Microfinance and Agricultural Input Subsidies in Tanzania

This paper investigates how and to what extent state-funded interventions can synergise with non-state programmes to achieve broader welfare effects for households in developing countries. We study two prominent programmes that benefit different groups of low-income households: state-funded agricultural input subsidies (AISs) and microfinance from non-state lenders. We use household data from Tanzania to estimate the effects of AISs and microfinance on the welfare of farmers and examine whether, as complementary, the two programmes benefit different groups of farmers. Using control function and instrumental variable approaches to control for the endogeneity of AISs and microfinance, we find that both programmes are effective in increasing household consumption. Moreover, results show that the two programmes operate in a complementary manner, whereby AISs are effective among low and middle-income farmers but not among well-off farmers. On the contrary, microfinance is effective among well-off farmers but not among low-income farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Development Studies
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2026.2614513
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergy for Poverty Reduction: The Complementary Roles of Microfinance and Agricultural Input Subsidies in Tanzania

kilugala malimi, Lina Song, Jing Zhang
The Journal of Development Studies
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Synergy for Poverty Reduction: The Complementary Roles of Microfinance and Agricultural Input Subsidies in Tanzania

kilugala malimi, Lina Song, Jing Zhang
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how and to what extent state-funded interventions can synergise with non-state programmes to achieve broader welfare effects for households in developing countries. We study two prominent programmes that benefit different groups of low-income households: state-funded agricultural input subsidies (AISs) and microfinance from non-state lenders. We use household data from Tanzania to estimate the effects of AISs and microfinance on the welfare of farmers and examine whether, as complementary, the two programmes benefit different groups of farmers. Using control function and instrumental variable approaches to control for the endogeneity of AISs and microfinance, we find that both programmes are effective in increasing household consumption. Moreover, results show that the two programmes operate in a complementary manner, whereby AISs are effective among low and middle-income farmers but not among well-off farmers. On the contrary, microfinance is effective among well-off farmers but not among low-income farmers.

The Journal of Development Studies
University of Nottingham (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.