Interpretation of the <scp>EU</scp> Nature Restoration Law: from pieces of a puzzle to a complete picture

The Regulation 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024, aiming at “the long‐term and sustained recovery of biodiverse and resilient ecosystems across the Member States' land and sea areas through the restoration of degraded ecosystems” is absolutely fundamental for Europe and for the rest of the world. Until 2027, and in the successive implementation periods of 2030, 2040, and 2050, the quality of restoration will largely depend on the ambition of legal interpretation. A minimalist interpretation can strike down the law and reduce its expected impact to nearly nothing. However, there are strong legal grounds to advocate in favor of a systemic interpretation. Rooted in arguments of comparison, coherence, and consistency, this article aims to demonstrate that systemic interpretation is the only viable hermeneutics respecting the rationale, legal context, and fundamental mandate of the Nature Restoration Law and consequently delivering effective long‐term restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70318
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretation of the EU Nature Restoration Law: from pieces of a puzzle to a complete picture

Karin van de Braak, Alexandra Aragão
Restoration Ecology
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Interpretation of the EU Nature Restoration Law: from pieces of a puzzle to a complete picture

Karin van de Braak, Alexandra Aragão
article en

Abstract

The Regulation 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024, aiming at “the long‐term and sustained recovery of biodiverse and resilient ecosystems across the Member States' land and sea areas through the restoration of degraded ecosystems” is absolutely fundamental for Europe and for the rest of the world. Until 2027, and in the successive implementation periods of 2030, 2040, and 2050, the quality of restoration will largely depend on the ambition of legal interpretation. A minimalist interpretation can strike down the law and reduce its expected impact to nearly nothing. However, there are strong legal grounds to advocate in favor of a systemic interpretation. Rooted in arguments of comparison, coherence, and consistency, this article aims to demonstrate that systemic interpretation is the only viable hermeneutics respecting the rationale, legal context, and fundamental mandate of the Nature Restoration Law and consequently delivering effective long‐term restoration.

Restoration Ecology
Ambient Systems (Netherlands) (NL), University of Coimbra (PT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.