Provincializing Modernism; or, Criticism After the End of Aesthetic History

Abstract: This essay argues that understanding the current situation of the aesthetic, about which Fredric Jameson was as right in 1984 as he would be were he to publish the "postmodernism" essay again today, requires scholars to let go of the forms of historiographical expectation and valuation that they have inherited from previous periods. Among the most persistent of these is a generalized modernism, which, this essay argues, characterizes not only the literary critical thinking of those who work in that specific area, but the entire discipline of literary studies itself. Letting go of this inheritance is therefore an important step in, first, a correct understanding of the current situation of the aesthetic, and, second, a broad reformation of the epistemological practices of the critical disciplines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New Literary History
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2025.a982259
Primary Topic
Contemporary Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provincializing Modernism; or, Criticism After the End of Aesthetic History

Eric Hayot
New Literary History
Contemporary Literature and Criticism
article

Provincializing Modernism; or, Criticism After the End of Aesthetic History

Eric Hayot
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay argues that understanding the current situation of the aesthetic, about which Fredric Jameson was as right in 1984 as he would be were he to publish the "postmodernism" essay again today, requires scholars to let go of the forms of historiographical expectation and valuation that they have inherited from previous periods. Among the most persistent of these is a generalized modernism, which, this essay argues, characterizes not only the literary critical thinking of those who work in that specific area, but the entire discipline of literary studies itself. Letting go of this inheritance is therefore an important step in, first, a correct understanding of the current situation of the aesthetic, and, second, a broad reformation of the epistemological practices of the critical disciplines.

New Literary HistoryVol. 56(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Contemporary Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.