Sufficient Passion: An Epistemology of Historicist Close Reading

Abstract: This essay makes three arguments. (1) Though obvious if one attends to everyday practice, it nevertheless remains necessary to contend, because of the intimate association today between close reading and New Criticism, that close reading is central to most historicist scholarship in literary studies; (2) Erich Auerbach is the crucial figure through which historicism, in the academy in the United States in the 1980s, adopted close reading, in traditions that pass through Catherine Gallagher, Stephen Greenblatt, Fredric Jameson, and Edward Said; and (3) the epistemology of historicist close reading in the traditions that inherited Auerbach depend, finally, on humanist faith in the faculty of the historical imagination, which, to succeed, must mount sufficient passion. In the end, the essay considers the degree to which epistemology stands against aesthetics as criteria for evaluating close reading in literary studies today.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New Literary History
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2025.a982263
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sufficient Passion: An Epistemology of Historicist Close Reading

Dan Sinykin
New Literary History
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
article

Sufficient Passion: An Epistemology of Historicist Close Reading

Dan Sinykin
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay makes three arguments. (1) Though obvious if one attends to everyday practice, it nevertheless remains necessary to contend, because of the intimate association today between close reading and New Criticism, that close reading is central to most historicist scholarship in literary studies; (2) Erich Auerbach is the crucial figure through which historicism, in the academy in the United States in the 1980s, adopted close reading, in traditions that pass through Catherine Gallagher, Stephen Greenblatt, Fredric Jameson, and Edward Said; and (3) the epistemology of historicist close reading in the traditions that inherited Auerbach depend, finally, on humanist faith in the faculty of the historical imagination, which, to succeed, must mount sufficient passion. In the end, the essay considers the degree to which epistemology stands against aesthetics as criteria for evaluating close reading in literary studies today.

New Literary HistoryVol. 56(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.