Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) of the cervical spinal cord has been thought to modulate lumbar networks, leading to the hypothesis that leg muscle recruitment may occur via recruitment of long-range spinal connections between cervical and lumbar circuits. To directly test this hypothesis, we compared arm and leg muscle responses elicited in unimpaired participants (N = 12) by cervical tSCS with the anodes placed over the iliac crests, with the anodes placed over the clavicles, and with lumbar tSCS as a control for leg muscle recruitment via the posterior root-muscle reflex. The idea of tSCS targeting cervico-lumbar connectivity would suggest that cervical stimulation could evoke responses in leg muscles. However, in our experiments, leg responses via cervical tSCS were only observed when the anodes were placed over the iliac crests, but not over the clavicles. These leg muscle responses had shorter latencies than those with lumbar tSCS and showed minimal post-activation depression, indicating efferent rather than afferent recruitment. Therefore, changes in leg muscle excitability by cervical-iliac tSCS previously attributed to descending cervical circuits could instead be explained by direct recruitment of efferent fibers near the iliac anodes. These findings suggest that cervical tSCS alone does not engage leg muscle motoneurons via long-range spinal or bidirectional pathways. Therefore, our study highlights the need to carefully consider electrode configuration when interpreting cervical tSCS mechanisms and additional or unexpected rehabilitative effects that extend caudally from the cervical spinal cord.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.06.702847
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Rachel Hawthorn, C. Scott Atkinson, Natalie Phelps, Ismael Seáñez et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Rachel Hawthorn, C. Scott Atkinson, Natalie Phelps, Ismael Seáñez, Rodolfo Edwin Keesey
article en

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) of the cervical spinal cord has been thought to modulate lumbar networks, leading to the hypothesis that leg muscle recruitment may occur via recruitment of long-range spinal connections between cervical and lumbar circuits. To directly test this hypothesis, we compared arm and leg muscle responses elicited in unimpaired participants (N = 12) by cervical tSCS with the anodes placed over the iliac crests, with the anodes placed over the clavicles, and with lumbar tSCS as a control for leg muscle recruitment via the posterior root-muscle reflex. The idea of tSCS targeting cervico-lumbar connectivity would suggest that cervical stimulation could evoke responses in leg muscles. However, in our experiments, leg responses via cervical tSCS were only observed when the anodes were placed over the iliac crests, but not over the clavicles. These leg muscle responses had shorter latencies than those with lumbar tSCS and showed minimal post-activation depression, indicating efferent rather than afferent recruitment. Therefore, changes in leg muscle excitability by cervical-iliac tSCS previously attributed to descending cervical circuits could instead be explained by direct recruitment of efferent fibers near the iliac anodes. These findings suggest that cervical tSCS alone does not engage leg muscle motoneurons via long-range spinal or bidirectional pathways. Therefore, our study highlights the need to carefully consider electrode configuration when interpreting cervical tSCS mechanisms and additional or unexpected rehabilitative effects that extend caudally from the cervical spinal cord.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.