Sharper than human eyes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning for retinal detachment detection

Retinal detachment (RD) is a sight-threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis to prevent vision loss. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offers potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in RD, addressing current limitations of manual interpretation. A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA 2018 guidelines was conducted. Studies utilizing ML for RD detection across imaging modalities were included. Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane) and manual searches identified 20 studies. Statistical analyses assessed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), with subgroup analyses by ML technique, imaging modality, validation method, and testing set size. From 69 models analyzed, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 95.7% (95% CI: 94.1-96.9%) and 99.2% (95% CI: 98.7-99.5%), respectively, indicating high diagnostic accuracy. DL models outperformed ML, achieving higher sensitivity (96.3% vs. 92.7%) and specificity (99.4% vs. 96.7%). Models employing fundus imaging exhibited superior performance (sensitivity: 97.3%; specificity: 99.5%). However, significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> > 90%) was noted. External validation enhanced specificity but highlighted challenges in generalizability due to biases in patient selection and data quality. ML demonstrates high potential for accurate RD detection, particularly using DL and fundus imaging. Nonetheless, addressing biases, heterogeneity, and external validation is crucial for clinical adoption. Future research should focus on standardization, cost-effectiveness, and multicenter validation to ensure practical ML integration in ophthalmology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261419673
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sharper than human eyes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning for retinal detachment detection

Paweł Łajczak, Anna Łajczak
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Sharper than human eyes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning for retinal detachment detection

Paweł Łajczak, Anna Łajczak
article en

Abstract

Retinal detachment (RD) is a sight-threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis to prevent vision loss. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offers potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in RD, addressing current limitations of manual interpretation. A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA 2018 guidelines was conducted. Studies utilizing ML for RD detection across imaging modalities were included. Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane) and manual searches identified 20 studies. Statistical analyses assessed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), with subgroup analyses by ML technique, imaging modality, validation method, and testing set size. From 69 models analyzed, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 95.7% (95% CI: 94.1-96.9%) and 99.2% (95% CI: 98.7-99.5%), respectively, indicating high diagnostic accuracy. DL models outperformed ML, achieving higher sensitivity (96.3% vs. 92.7%) and specificity (99.4% vs. 96.7%). Models employing fundus imaging exhibited superior performance (sensitivity: 97.3%; specificity: 99.5%). However, significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> > 90%) was noted. External validation enhanced specificity but highlighted challenges in generalizability due to biases in patient selection and data quality. ML demonstrates high potential for accurate RD detection, particularly using DL and fundus imaging. Nonetheless, addressing biases, heterogeneity, and external validation is crucial for clinical adoption. Future research should focus on standardization, cost-effectiveness, and multicenter validation to ensure practical ML integration in ophthalmology.

European Journal of Ophthalmology
Medical University of Silesia (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sharper than human eyes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning for retinal detachment detection — Paweł Łajczak, Anna Łajczak · European Journal of Ophthalmology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS