Comparison of the Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine Type 2-Receptor Antagonists in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Complications

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in preventing gastrointestinal (GI) complications, particularly bleeding, in high-risk patient populations, including ICU patients and individuals taking aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane-aligned principles. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and large cohort studies published between 1997 and 2025 were included. Searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and SpringerLink to identify studies comparing PPIs and H2RAs with respect to prophylactic effectiveness and adverse outcomes, including infections, pneumonia, and mortality. Data were synthesized narratively with emphasis on studies of higher methodological quality. Overall, the reviewed evidence generally suggested that PPIs reduce clinically significant bleeding more effectively than H2RAs in ICU settings and in patients receiving aspirin or DAPT. Among NSAID users, PPIs were also more effective for ulcer healing and prevention. In contrast, several analyses indicated higher rates of certain adverse events among PPI recipients, particularly infections and possibly pneumonia, while H2RAs appeared to have a more favorable safety profile for these outcomes. Mortality findings were inconsistent across studies, with some large trials reporting no meaningful differences between drug classes. In conclusion, PPIs may offer greater protection against bleeding and ulceration than H2RAs but can be associated with a higher risk of selected adverse events. Prophylactic therapy should be individualized by balancing expected benefits with patient-specific risks, including infection risk and concurrent antiplatelet therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103329
Primary Topic
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine Type 2-Receptor Antagonists in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Complications

Kamil Wroblewski, Barbara Balajewicz, Karolina Lichwala, Angelika Samborska et al.
Cureus
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
article

Comparison of the Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine Type 2-Receptor Antagonists in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Complications

Kamil Wroblewski, Barbara Balajewicz, Karolina Lichwala, Angelika Samborska, Sara Szukalska, Lukasz Siwek, Marta Karczewska
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in preventing gastrointestinal (GI) complications, particularly bleeding, in high-risk patient populations, including ICU patients and individuals taking aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A literature review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane-aligned principles. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and large cohort studies published between 1997 and 2025 were included. Searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and SpringerLink to identify studies comparing PPIs and H2RAs with respect to prophylactic effectiveness and adverse outcomes, including infections, pneumonia, and mortality. Data were synthesized narratively with emphasis on studies of higher methodological quality. Overall, the reviewed evidence generally suggested that PPIs reduce clinically significant bleeding more effectively than H2RAs in ICU settings and in patients receiving aspirin or DAPT. Among NSAID users, PPIs were also more effective for ulcer healing and prevention. In contrast, several analyses indicated higher rates of certain adverse events among PPI recipients, particularly infections and possibly pneumonia, while H2RAs appeared to have a more favorable safety profile for these outcomes. Mortality findings were inconsistent across studies, with some large trials reporting no meaningful differences between drug classes. In conclusion, PPIs may offer greater protection against bleeding and ulceration than H2RAs but can be associated with a higher risk of selected adverse events. Prophylactic therapy should be individualized by balancing expected benefits with patient-specific risks, including infection risk and concurrent antiplatelet therapy.

CureusVol. 18(2)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny nr 4 w Bytomiu (PL), Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.