The Effect of Personal Bankruptcy Policies on Household Consumption: Evidence from CFPS Data

Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) between 2016 and 2022, this paper empirically investigates the influence of personal bankruptcy policies on household consumption in China. By leveraging the introduction of pilot bankruptcy programs as a quasi-natural experiment and applying a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the results show that the implementation of personal bankruptcy systems significantly increases household spending. The results remain robust after accounting for potential biases and conducting various robustness tests. Further analysis reveals that the primary mechanism is through reducing residents’ precautionary savings motives. Specifically, the system enhances households’ risk appetite and diminishes the tendency to save as a buffer against income and health uncertainties, thereby encouraging higher consumption levels. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the positive effect is stronger among individuals with higher education, larger families, and residents in regions with greater market integration or more developed service sectors. Additionally, the policy promotes consumption related to household development and reduces the Engel coefficient, indicating improved living standards. Importantly, the policy has not led to significant household over-indebtedness. Overall, this paper contributes to understanding the economic benefits of personal bankruptcy policies and offers policy insights to boost household consumption and stimulate domestic demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
经济学报.
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/cje.2025.9300412
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Personal Bankruptcy Policies on Household Consumption: Evidence from CFPS Data

Jia He, Weilun Tian, Jiarui Wang
经济学报.
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

The Effect of Personal Bankruptcy Policies on Household Consumption: Evidence from CFPS Data

Jia He, Weilun Tian, Jiarui Wang
article en

Abstract

Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) between 2016 and 2022, this paper empirically investigates the influence of personal bankruptcy policies on household consumption in China. By leveraging the introduction of pilot bankruptcy programs as a quasi-natural experiment and applying a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the results show that the implementation of personal bankruptcy systems significantly increases household spending. The results remain robust after accounting for potential biases and conducting various robustness tests. Further analysis reveals that the primary mechanism is through reducing residents’ precautionary savings motives. Specifically, the system enhances households’ risk appetite and diminishes the tendency to save as a buffer against income and health uncertainties, thereby encouraging higher consumption levels. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the positive effect is stronger among individuals with higher education, larger families, and residents in regions with greater market integration or more developed service sectors. Additionally, the policy promotes consumption related to household development and reduces the Engel coefficient, indicating improved living standards. Importantly, the policy has not led to significant household over-indebtedness. Overall, this paper contributes to understanding the economic benefits of personal bankruptcy policies and offers policy insights to boost household consumption and stimulate domestic demand.

经济学报.Vol. 12(4)
Nankai University (CN), Zhengzhou Business University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.