Assessing Institutional Readiness and Willingness of Philippine LGUs to Adopt Geospatial Land Use Monitoring Tools

Abstract. Land use planning and monitoring are central to sustainable development, yet many Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Philippines face limited technical capacity, outdated tools, and weak institutional systems. This study assessed the institutional willingness and capacity of LGUs to adopt geospatial land use monitoring technologies using six indicators: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) status, GIS capacity, remote sensing capacity, enforcement tools, data management systems, and willingness to adopt new technologies. Expert-derived weights for these indicators, elicited through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with DHSUD central and regional staff, were applied to compute readiness scores from a nationwide survey of 666 LGUs. Findings show that most LGUs fall within the Transitioning category, with fewer classified as Advanced and only a small number Limited. Weighted readiness scores cluster between 0.5 and 0.6, with GIS and remote sensing capacities particularly low (41.75% and 12.31%), though willingness to adopt is high at 84%. The readiness score distribution is left-skewed, suggesting that most LGUs already demonstrate moderate-to-high capacity and are closer to readiness than not. Radar chart analysis highlights uneven progress: CLUP updating and willingness are strong, while gaps persist in remote sensing, data management, and enforcement. Viewed through the IAD framework, these patterns underscore how institutional rules, resources, and organizational arrangements influence LGU performance, with structural bottlenecks limiting adoption. Recommendations include: foundational training and shared services for Limited LGUs; structured pathways for Transitioning LGUs to integrate geospatial monitoring; incentives and peer-learning platforms for Advanced LGUs; and embedding readiness-based pathways into national policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-5-w4-2025-95-2026
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Institutional Readiness and Willingness of Philippine LGUs to Adopt Geospatial Land Use Monitoring Tools

Aquila Kristian B. Esmeralda, Mohammad Haydrey K. Aminulla, Ibani C. Padao, Aaron Jairo D.C. Carrido et al.
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

Assessing Institutional Readiness and Willingness of Philippine LGUs to Adopt Geospatial Land Use Monitoring Tools

Aquila Kristian B. Esmeralda, Mohammad Haydrey K. Aminulla, Ibani C. Padao, Aaron Jairo D.C. Carrido, Peter Alexander G. Felix, Francine Alaine Soriano, Ruth R. Roxas, Mylene A. Rivera, Alyssa F. Petacio, Laarni M. Magayanes
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Land use planning and monitoring are central to sustainable development, yet many Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Philippines face limited technical capacity, outdated tools, and weak institutional systems. This study assessed the institutional willingness and capacity of LGUs to adopt geospatial land use monitoring technologies using six indicators: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) status, GIS capacity, remote sensing capacity, enforcement tools, data management systems, and willingness to adopt new technologies. Expert-derived weights for these indicators, elicited through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with DHSUD central and regional staff, were applied to compute readiness scores from a nationwide survey of 666 LGUs. Findings show that most LGUs fall within the Transitioning category, with fewer classified as Advanced and only a small number Limited. Weighted readiness scores cluster between 0.5 and 0.6, with GIS and remote sensing capacities particularly low (41.75% and 12.31%), though willingness to adopt is high at 84%. The readiness score distribution is left-skewed, suggesting that most LGUs already demonstrate moderate-to-high capacity and are closer to readiness than not. Radar chart analysis highlights uneven progress: CLUP updating and willingness are strong, while gaps persist in remote sensing, data management, and enforcement. Viewed through the IAD framework, these patterns underscore how institutional rules, resources, and organizational arrangements influence LGU performance, with structural bottlenecks limiting adoption. Recommendations include: foundational training and shared services for Limited LGUs; structured pathways for Transitioning LGUs to integrate geospatial monitoring; incentives and peer-learning platforms for Advanced LGUs; and embedding readiness-based pathways into national policy.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLVIII-5/W4-2025
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (US), University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
Philippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.