A post-mortem audit of the prevalence of ketoacidosis in diabetes and alcohol dependency

This study demonstrated a statistically significant risk of developing ketoacidosis in all individuals with both diabetes mellitus and alcohol dependency (Group 3) when compared to diabetics alone (Group 1): Risk ratio = 3.8; p = .0001). There was less but significant increased risk when females alone were compared in these two groups. Less but significant increased risk was also found in all Group 3 individuals when compared to those in the alcohol alone category (Group 2) or when all individuals or males alone were compared between Group 1 + Group 2 with those in (Group 3). There was no significant increased risk when diabetics in Group 1 were compared to persons with alcohol dependency in Group 2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2026.103088
Primary Topic
Diabetes and associated disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A post-mortem audit of the prevalence of ketoacidosis in diabetes and alcohol dependency

Andrew Peter Vanezis, Peter Vanezis, Ganesh Raj Selvaraja, Limone Nahar et al.
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Diabetes and associated disorders
article

A post-mortem audit of the prevalence of ketoacidosis in diabetes and alcohol dependency

Andrew Peter Vanezis, Peter Vanezis, Ganesh Raj Selvaraja, Limone Nahar, Rebecca Andrews
article en

Abstract

This study demonstrated a statistically significant risk of developing ketoacidosis in all individuals with both diabetes mellitus and alcohol dependency (Group 3) when compared to diabetics alone (Group 1): Risk ratio = 3.8; p = .0001). There was less but significant increased risk when females alone were compared in these two groups. Less but significant increased risk was also found in all Group 3 individuals when compared to those in the alcohol alone category (Group 2) or when all individuals or males alone were compared between Group 1 + Group 2 with those in (Group 3). There was no significant increased risk when diabetics in Group 1 were compared to persons with alcohol dependency in Group 2.

Journal of Forensic and Legal MedicineVol. 118
Ministry of Health (MY), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), Nottingham City Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Diabetes and associated disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.