Public servants or privileged elites? -Analyzing physician strikes in the Republic of Korea

The 2024 mass physician strike in Korea highlights a fundamental tension within modern healthcare systems. As a health system operating a hybrid model where health financing and health service organizing are divided into public and private domains, respectively, the Korean health system's conflicts warrant a close analysis to expand our knowledge of health systems. Viewing the event through dialectical materialist perspective, this essay explains that the 2024 strike represents the culmination of irreconcilable contradictions embedded within Korea's healthcare system and the physician profession. The essay offers three considerations for successful reforms: 1) recognizing the fundamental conflict between viewing healthcare as a commodity versus a public good 2) recognizing and contend with the dynamics of class struggle between physicians, other health professionals, and the public, and 3) recognizing the exploitative labor environment that fuels internal contradictions within the profession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119092
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public servants or privileged elites? -Analyzing physician strikes in the Republic of Korea

Seongwon Choi
Social Science & Medicine
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
article

Public servants or privileged elites? -Analyzing physician strikes in the Republic of Korea

Seongwon Choi
article en

Abstract

The 2024 mass physician strike in Korea highlights a fundamental tension within modern healthcare systems. As a health system operating a hybrid model where health financing and health service organizing are divided into public and private domains, respectively, the Korean health system's conflicts warrant a close analysis to expand our knowledge of health systems. Viewing the event through dialectical materialist perspective, this essay explains that the 2024 strike represents the culmination of irreconcilable contradictions embedded within Korea's healthcare system and the physician profession. The essay offers three considerations for successful reforms: 1) recognizing the fundamental conflict between viewing healthcare as a commodity versus a public good 2) recognizing and contend with the dynamics of class struggle between physicians, other health professionals, and the public, and 3) recognizing the exploitative labor environment that fuels internal contradictions within the profession.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 395
California State University Los Angeles (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public servants or privileged elites? -Analyzing physician strikes in the Republic of Korea — Seongwon Choi · Social Science & Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS