Does mental health coaching improve efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression? A pilot randomized controlled trial and benchmarking study

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is common and burdensome. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is recommended for individuals who do not respond to first-line treatments. Coach-supported digital mental health programs are scalable strategies for delivering therapeutic content. This randomized controlled trial tested whether digital mental health programs bolster rTMS for MDD. N = 36 depressed adults completed a six-week course of rTMS. Of this group, n = 18 were randomized to digital cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT with Coaching), and n = 18 were randomized to digital narrative stories of hope (iNarratives with Coaching). Multilevel models tested group differences in treatment outcomes over time. Principal outcomes focused on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Exploratory analyses compared outcomes versus a Benchmarking Sample of N = 29 patients who received rTMS without coaching. There was a main effect of time (p < .001), indicating an overall reduction in depression symptoms during the trial. Contrary to hypotheses, there was no Group x Time interaction (p = .662), and groups did not differ on clinical response rates (p = .654). Secondary analyses found that the iNarratives group showed greater improvement in positive emotion and functional impairment, whereas the iCBT group showed less dropout from the coaching intervention. Exploratory analyses found a Group x Time interaction (p = .039), potentially suggesting that participants in iCBT or iNarratives showed steeper symptom reduction versus the Benchmarking Sample. The coach-supported iCBT and iNarratives approaches are comparable as adjuncts to rTMS for depression and may yield lower depression scores versus rTMS alone. iNarratives effects appeared specific to increases in positive emotions and decreases in functional impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121366
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does mental health coaching improve efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression? A pilot randomized controlled trial and benchmarking study

Michelle Genevieve Craske, Nora M. Barnes‐Horowitz, Jiani LI, Cole Matthews et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Does mental health coaching improve efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression? A pilot randomized controlled trial and benchmarking study

Michelle Genevieve Craske, Nora M. Barnes‐Horowitz, Jiani LI, Cole Matthews, Michael Millard, Benjamin M. Rosenberg, Jill M. Newby, Doan Ngo, Thomas Valles, Kelly Y. Cai, Chiana Yang, Isabelle Lanser, Aleeza West, Andrew F. Leuchter, Jung Woon Park, Ossanna H. Amran
article en

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is common and burdensome. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is recommended for individuals who do not respond to first-line treatments. Coach-supported digital mental health programs are scalable strategies for delivering therapeutic content. This randomized controlled trial tested whether digital mental health programs bolster rTMS for MDD. N = 36 depressed adults completed a six-week course of rTMS. Of this group, n = 18 were randomized to digital cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT with Coaching), and n = 18 were randomized to digital narrative stories of hope (iNarratives with Coaching). Multilevel models tested group differences in treatment outcomes over time. Principal outcomes focused on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Exploratory analyses compared outcomes versus a Benchmarking Sample of N = 29 patients who received rTMS without coaching. There was a main effect of time (p < .001), indicating an overall reduction in depression symptoms during the trial. Contrary to hypotheses, there was no Group x Time interaction (p = .662), and groups did not differ on clinical response rates (p = .654). Secondary analyses found that the iNarratives group showed greater improvement in positive emotion and functional impairment, whereas the iCBT group showed less dropout from the coaching intervention. Exploratory analyses found a Group x Time interaction (p = .039), potentially suggesting that participants in iCBT or iNarratives showed steeper symptom reduction versus the Benchmarking Sample. The coach-supported iCBT and iNarratives approaches are comparable as adjuncts to rTMS for depression and may yield lower depression scores versus rTMS alone. iNarratives effects appeared specific to increases in positive emotions and decreases in functional impairment.

Journal of Affective DisordersVol. 402
University of Southern California (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Black Dog Institute (AU), Pomona College (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Brown University (US), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Neurobehavioral Systems (US), Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US), Western University of Health Sciences (US), Fuller Theological Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.