The Scientific Case for Animal Models: A Perspective From Musculoskeletal Researchers

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has launched a major initiative to expand human-based New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in biomedical research and reduce reliance on animal models. While NAMs offer powerful complementary tools, animal-based research remains indispensable in musculoskeletal science for understanding complex cellular and systemic processes, disease onset and progression, and developing effective therapies. Foundational knowledge of embryonic development, disease mechanisms, tissue regeneration, gene function, and systemic pharmacology has emerged from animal models and will continue to do so. This review underscores the essential role of animal models in five key areas of musculoskeletal biology: osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, bone fracture repair and regeneration, bone cancer, and Inherited Skeletal Disorders (ISDs). We also examine NAMs including organoids, engineered scaffolds, organ-on-chip platforms, and Artificial Intelligence (AI)/computational modeling, highlighting their strengths in mechanistic and high-throughput studies but also their limitations in replicating in vivo structural, physiological, biomechanical, and systemic complexity. Animal models remain the gold standard for exploring disease mechanisms, testing preclinical therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy and safety, and translating discoveries into clinical practice. Rather than replacing animal research, NAMs should be integrated as complementary approaches to advance understanding and innovation. Curtailing animal research would jeopardize medical progress and hinder life-saving interventions for humans and animals alike. This review aims to inform the public and policymakers on the continued necessity of ethically conducted animal research as a cornerstone of musculoskeletal health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FASEB BioAdvances
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2025-00313
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Scientific Case for Animal Models: A Perspective From Musculoskeletal Researchers

Blake E. Hildreth, Michael Hadjiargyrou, Frank C. Ko, Tao Yang et al.
FASEB BioAdvances
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

The Scientific Case for Animal Models: A Perspective From Musculoskeletal Researchers

Blake E. Hildreth, Michael Hadjiargyrou, Frank C. Ko, Tao Yang, Uma Sankar
article en

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has launched a major initiative to expand human-based New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in biomedical research and reduce reliance on animal models. While NAMs offer powerful complementary tools, animal-based research remains indispensable in musculoskeletal science for understanding complex cellular and systemic processes, disease onset and progression, and developing effective therapies. Foundational knowledge of embryonic development, disease mechanisms, tissue regeneration, gene function, and systemic pharmacology has emerged from animal models and will continue to do so. This review underscores the essential role of animal models in five key areas of musculoskeletal biology: osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, bone fracture repair and regeneration, bone cancer, and Inherited Skeletal Disorders (ISDs). We also examine NAMs including organoids, engineered scaffolds, organ-on-chip platforms, and Artificial Intelligence (AI)/computational modeling, highlighting their strengths in mechanistic and high-throughput studies but also their limitations in replicating in vivo structural, physiological, biomechanical, and systemic complexity. Animal models remain the gold standard for exploring disease mechanisms, testing preclinical therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy and safety, and translating discoveries into clinical practice. Rather than replacing animal research, NAMs should be integrated as complementary approaches to advance understanding and innovation. Curtailing animal research would jeopardize medical progress and hinder life-saving interventions for humans and animals alike. This review aims to inform the public and policymakers on the continued necessity of ethically conducted animal research as a cornerstone of musculoskeletal health.

FASEB BioAdvancesVol. 8(2)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Van Andel Institute (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), New York Institute of Technology (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.