Life Cycle Assessment Studies on Next-Generation Secondary Batteries for Electric Vehicles: Review

This study critically reviews life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on next-generation secondary batteries (rechargeable battery) for electric vehicle (EV) applications, focusing on lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with silicon nanowire/nanotube (SiNW/SiNT) anodes, all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs), and lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. The reviewed work is analyzed in terms of how the goal and scope of the LCA are defined, how life cycle inventories (LCIs) are constructed, and how the environmental impacts are assessed. The energy-intensive manufacturing process of next-generation secondary batteries is a factor in their higher environmental impact compared to conventional LIB manufacturing processes. This suggests that the superiority of LCI can vary depending on the method used to construct the LCI and the assumptions surrounding the manufacturing process. Moreover, most LCA works of these emerging battery systems employ heterogeneous functional units, rely on laboratory-scale studies at low technology readiness levels using bottom-up inventory modelling, and are restricted to cradle-to-gate system boundaries. These characteristics hinder a consistent comparison of environmental impacts across battery chemistries, resulting in substantial uncertainty due to limited data quality. Based on these findings, the paper underlines the need for partial standardization of functional units and system boundaries, systematic inclusion of the use phase, and more rigorous sensitivity and scenario analyses in LCAs of next-generation secondary batteries. It further proposes that future studies adopt top-down LCI construction approaches in which desirable LCA outcomes are first set as targets, and the process conditions and LCI datasets required to meet these targets are subsequently inferred in a backward manner.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62765/kjlca.2025.26.3.111
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment Studies on Next-Generation Secondary Batteries for Electric Vehicles: Review

Yong-Chul Jang, KOSAN ROH, Taean Ryu, Kanghyun Choi et al.
Korean Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Life Cycle Assessment Studies on Next-Generation Secondary Batteries for Electric Vehicles: Review

Yong-Chul Jang, KOSAN ROH, Taean Ryu, Kanghyun Choi, Hyeongeun Cho, Hojae Choi
article en

Abstract

This study critically reviews life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on next-generation secondary batteries (rechargeable battery) for electric vehicle (EV) applications, focusing on lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with silicon nanowire/nanotube (SiNW/SiNT) anodes, all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs), and lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. The reviewed work is analyzed in terms of how the goal and scope of the LCA are defined, how life cycle inventories (LCIs) are constructed, and how the environmental impacts are assessed. The energy-intensive manufacturing process of next-generation secondary batteries is a factor in their higher environmental impact compared to conventional LIB manufacturing processes. This suggests that the superiority of LCI can vary depending on the method used to construct the LCI and the assumptions surrounding the manufacturing process. Moreover, most LCA works of these emerging battery systems employ heterogeneous functional units, rely on laboratory-scale studies at low technology readiness levels using bottom-up inventory modelling, and are restricted to cradle-to-gate system boundaries. These characteristics hinder a consistent comparison of environmental impacts across battery chemistries, resulting in substantial uncertainty due to limited data quality. Based on these findings, the paper underlines the need for partial standardization of functional units and system boundaries, systematic inclusion of the use phase, and more rigorous sensitivity and scenario analyses in LCAs of next-generation secondary batteries. It further proposes that future studies adopt top-down LCI construction approaches in which desirable LCA outcomes are first set as targets, and the process conditions and LCI datasets required to meet these targets are subsequently inferred in a backward manner.

Korean Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 26(3)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.