Bridging Mythology and Science: Lessons from a Mental Mapping Workshop on the Perception of Environmental Health Crises

This article presents a report on a mental mapping workshop conducted in Estonia within the framework of the CHRYSES project, examining the methodological, ethical and analytical insights gained at the workshop and situating them within a broader theoretical context. Drawing on both the structure and outcomes of the workshop and making comparisons with other topical case studies, the article demonstrates how mental mapping can serve as an effective tool for uncovering differences and gaps between scientific and grassroots (for example mythological-folkloric) approaches to environmental health crises (EHC). These variations – manifested in spatial priorities, narrative emphases, and related risk assessments – offer critical lessons for improving public communication and engagement in the face of future EHC scenarios. By highlighting best practice considerations, this study contributes to advancing participatory methods that bridge knowledge systems and enhance resilience in environmental health governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Yearbook of Balkan and Baltic Studies
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7592/ybbs8.2.07
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Mythology and Science: Lessons from a Mental Mapping Workshop on the Perception of Environmental Health Crises

Mare Kalda, Reet Hiiemäe
Yearbook of Balkan and Baltic Studies
Risk Perception and Management
article

Bridging Mythology and Science: Lessons from a Mental Mapping Workshop on the Perception of Environmental Health Crises

Mare Kalda, Reet Hiiemäe
article en

Abstract

This article presents a report on a mental mapping workshop conducted in Estonia within the framework of the CHRYSES project, examining the methodological, ethical and analytical insights gained at the workshop and situating them within a broader theoretical context. Drawing on both the structure and outcomes of the workshop and making comparisons with other topical case studies, the article demonstrates how mental mapping can serve as an effective tool for uncovering differences and gaps between scientific and grassroots (for example mythological-folkloric) approaches to environmental health crises (EHC). These variations – manifested in spatial priorities, narrative emphases, and related risk assessments – offer critical lessons for improving public communication and engagement in the face of future EHC scenarios. By highlighting best practice considerations, this study contributes to advancing participatory methods that bridge knowledge systems and enhance resilience in environmental health governance.

Yearbook of Balkan and Baltic StudiesVol. 8(2)
UK Research and Innovation, Eesti Teadusagentuur, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.