From (almost) open to heavily restricted data access – The development of the Twitter/X developer policies

Archiving data is a crucial practice, as it ensures reproducibility of research and aligns with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). To facilitate data sharing, it is essential to understand the legal conditions, especially in the form of policies, at the time of data collection. However, these policies can be difficult to locate, change over time, and may even disappear as new policies are introduced. Terms of Service are a common form of such policies. With the growing use of Twitter/X data in the social sciences, and the restriction of access to the data by the platform itself, investigating ways of sharing of this data has become even more important, and having Terms of Service at hand to check the legal conditions at the time of data collection is a crucial task. To illustrate this use case, we compiled a complete collection of Twitter/X's conditions for sharing data from 2006 until 2023. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, we analyse how data sharing conditions have changed. We find that while the Terms of Service become increasingly longer and more complicated, their restrictiveness varies over time. However, our analysis further shows that sharing of full tweet objects both in retrospect and in the future is not usually covered and thus affecting the reproducibility of research as rehydration of tweets is no longer feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data & Society
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261419333
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
99.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From (almost) open to heavily restricted data access – The development of the Twitter/X developer policies

Libby Bishop, Oliver Watteler, Jan Schwalbach, Jonas Recker et al.
1 citations
Big Data & Society
Research Data Management Practices
99.41
article

From (almost) open to heavily restricted data access – The development of the Twitter/X developer policies

Libby Bishop, Oliver Watteler, Jan Schwalbach, Jonas Recker, Luisa Golland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Archiving data is a crucial practice, as it ensures reproducibility of research and aligns with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). To facilitate data sharing, it is essential to understand the legal conditions, especially in the form of policies, at the time of data collection. However, these policies can be difficult to locate, change over time, and may even disappear as new policies are introduced. Terms of Service are a common form of such policies. With the growing use of Twitter/X data in the social sciences, and the restriction of access to the data by the platform itself, investigating ways of sharing of this data has become even more important, and having Terms of Service at hand to check the legal conditions at the time of data collection is a crucial task. To illustrate this use case, we compiled a complete collection of Twitter/X's conditions for sharing data from 2006 until 2023. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, we analyse how data sharing conditions have changed. We find that while the Terms of Service become increasingly longer and more complicated, their restrictiveness varies over time. However, our analysis further shows that sharing of full tweet objects both in retrospect and in the future is not usually covered and thus affecting the reproducibility of research as rehydration of tweets is no longer feasible.

Big Data & SocietyVol. 13(1)
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Research Data Management Practices
99.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.