The current state of microsurgical training models in the field of plastic surgery: a narrative review

Abstract Microsurgery, used across medical specialties like plastic surgery, requires extensive training due to its steep learning curve. Live animal models are the gold standard for simulation, but ethical and financial challenges have led to the development of alternative physical and virtual models. This study reviews non-living physical and virtual microsurgical simulation models to inform curriculum development. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified 42 relevant studies (2017–2024). These models are categorized into physical (non-living, non-animal, non-living animal, and non-living human) and virtual (non-immersive or immersive). While live animals remain the gold standard, these models provide valuable training opportunities. Despite challenges in realism, accessibility, and cost, integrating a variety of physical and virtual models into microsurgical education can enhance training by offering diverse experiences before operating in real-world settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-025-00469-0
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The current state of microsurgical training models in the field of plastic surgery: a narrative review

Sahand C. Eftekari, Aaron M. Dingle, D’Andrea T. Donnelly, Taylor Penn et al.
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

The current state of microsurgical training models in the field of plastic surgery: a narrative review

Sahand C. Eftekari, Aaron M. Dingle, D’Andrea T. Donnelly, Taylor Penn, Sarah Jung, Ellen C. Shaffrey
article en

Abstract

Abstract Microsurgery, used across medical specialties like plastic surgery, requires extensive training due to its steep learning curve. Live animal models are the gold standard for simulation, but ethical and financial challenges have led to the development of alternative physical and virtual models. This study reviews non-living physical and virtual microsurgical simulation models to inform curriculum development. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified 42 relevant studies (2017–2024). These models are categorized into physical (non-living, non-animal, non-living animal, and non-living human) and virtual (non-immersive or immersive). While live animals remain the gold standard, these models provide valuable training opportunities. Despite challenges in realism, accessibility, and cost, integrating a variety of physical and virtual models into microsurgical education can enhance training by offering diverse experiences before operating in real-world settings.

Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical EducationVol. 5(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.