Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Efficacy of <i>Albizia anthelmintica</i> and <i>Vepris glomerata</i> Leaves

Introduction Medicinal plants are important sources of bioactive compounds used in traditional and modern medicine. Albizia anthelmintica Brongn. and Vepris glomerata (F. Hoffm.) Engl. are commonly used in Ethiopian traditional medicine to treat bacterial infections, fever, and inflammation, but scientific evidence of their antibacterial activity is limited. Objective This study aims to evaluate the phytochemical composition and in vitro antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of A. anthelmintica and V. glomerata using solvents of varying polarity. Methods Leaf powders of each plant were successively extracted with petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, and methanol. The extracts were screened for major phytochemicals such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, saponins, tannins, terpenoids, steroids, and glycosides using standard qualitative methods. Antibacterial activity was determined by the agar well diffusion method against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603), and Pasteurella multocida (clinical isolate, EPHI) at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 mg/mL. Ciprofloxacin was used as the positive control, and 1% DMSO served as the negative control. Results Phytochemical screening revealed a range of secondary metabolites in both species, with variations depending on solvent polarity. The chloroform and acetone extracts of A. anthelmintica exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae (29.5 ± 0.36 mm) and P. multocida (25.4 ± 0.62 mm). Likewise, the petroleum ether and chloroform extracts of V. glomerata showed notable inhibition against K. pneumoniae (29.7 ± 0.46 mm) and P. multocida (23.1 ± 0.53 mm). All extracts demonstrated concentration-dependent antibacterial effects, with statistical analysis (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.05) confirming significant differences among them. Conclusion A. anthelmintica and V. glomerata leaves exhibit potent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, likely due to multiple bioactive phytochemicals. These findings support the traditional use of these plants and suggest potential for the development of plant-based antimicrobials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Product Communications
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x261418407
Primary Topic
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Efficacy of Albizia anthelmintica and Vepris glomerata Leaves

Habtamu Abebe, Asmera Amde, Obsa Asafa, Tekle Olbamo et al.
Natural Product Communications
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
article

Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Efficacy of Albizia anthelmintica and Vepris glomerata Leaves

Habtamu Abebe, Asmera Amde, Obsa Asafa, Tekle Olbamo, Hamer Hansha, Tadasa Hailu, Rediet Gossaye, Kefita Kaba
article en

Abstract

Introduction Medicinal plants are important sources of bioactive compounds used in traditional and modern medicine. Albizia anthelmintica Brongn. and Vepris glomerata (F. Hoffm.) Engl. are commonly used in Ethiopian traditional medicine to treat bacterial infections, fever, and inflammation, but scientific evidence of their antibacterial activity is limited. Objective This study aims to evaluate the phytochemical composition and in vitro antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of A. anthelmintica and V. glomerata using solvents of varying polarity. Methods Leaf powders of each plant were successively extracted with petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, and methanol. The extracts were screened for major phytochemicals such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, saponins, tannins, terpenoids, steroids, and glycosides using standard qualitative methods. Antibacterial activity was determined by the agar well diffusion method against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603), and Pasteurella multocida (clinical isolate, EPHI) at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 mg/mL. Ciprofloxacin was used as the positive control, and 1% DMSO served as the negative control. Results Phytochemical screening revealed a range of secondary metabolites in both species, with variations depending on solvent polarity. The chloroform and acetone extracts of A. anthelmintica exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae (29.5 ± 0.36 mm) and P. multocida (25.4 ± 0.62 mm). Likewise, the petroleum ether and chloroform extracts of V. glomerata showed notable inhibition against K. pneumoniae (29.7 ± 0.46 mm) and P. multocida (23.1 ± 0.53 mm). All extracts demonstrated concentration-dependent antibacterial effects, with statistical analysis (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.05) confirming significant differences among them. Conclusion A. anthelmintica and V. glomerata leaves exhibit potent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, likely due to multiple bioactive phytochemicals. These findings support the traditional use of these plants and suggest potential for the development of plant-based antimicrobials.

Natural Product CommunicationsVol. 21(2)
Jinka University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.