Protocol of a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to compare pericapsular nerve group block, fascia-iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain management in patients with a hip fracture in the emergency department (CPFF-ED)

This randomized controlled trial with a superiority design will allow conclusions on which regional nerve block is most effective in improving pre-operative wellbeing in patients with a neck of femur or pertrochanteric fracture. The choice to use a patient reported outcome measure to evaluate block efficacy maximizes clinical relevance. And by allowing the choice of local anaesthetic to the participating hospital (with a 1:1:1 randomization for each participating centre) clinical applicability of our findings is maximized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342422
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
78.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocol of a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to compare pericapsular nerve group block, fascia-iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain management in patients with a hip fracture in the emergency department (CPFF-ED)

Ewoud ter Avest, Svenja L Haak, Heleen Lameijer, Jurian Dolstra et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Hip and Femur Fractures
78.29
article

Protocol of a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to compare pericapsular nerve group block, fascia-iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain management in patients with a hip fracture in the emergency department (CPFF-ED)

Ewoud ter Avest, Svenja L Haak, Heleen Lameijer, Jurian Dolstra, E. Christiaan Boerma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial with a superiority design will allow conclusions on which regional nerve block is most effective in improving pre-operative wellbeing in patients with a neck of femur or pertrochanteric fracture. The choice to use a patient reported outcome measure to evaluate block efficacy maximizes clinical relevance. And by allowing the choice of local anaesthetic to the participating hospital (with a 1:1:1 randomization for each participating centre) clinical applicability of our findings is maximized.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Fryske Akademy (NL), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL), London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Hip and Femur Fractures
78.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.