The paradox of plenty: tenure insecurity and grassroots resistance in <i>How Beautiful We Were</i> by Imbolo Mbue

This article examines Imbolo Mbue’s How Beautiful We Were through the lens of Ulrich Beck’s Risk Society theory and the concept of ecological grief, illustrating how oil extraction leads to environmental devastation, tenure insecurity, community resistance, and psychological harm. Set in the fictional African village of Kosawa, Mbue’s novel critiques the roles of governments and corporate companies in perpetuating a risk society, inequality, and environmental injustice. Grounded in Beck’s theory of Risk Society, this study critically analyses the risks created by modern industrial and political systems. Furthermore, the analysis reveals how these manufactured risks contribute to inequalities that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Through its narrative, the novel captures the dynamics of a risk society, showing how natural resource exploitation fosters grassroots activism and challenges hegemonic authority. In addition, the concept of ecological grief was employed to analyze the affective consequences of environmental destruction. Through a comprehensive examination of characters and narrative structures, this study explores how the community suffers from industrial expansion while also resisting corporate exploitation. In conclusion, this study contributes to African environmental literature by revealing how extractive practices in ‘resource-curse’ regions mirror the real-world problems of inequality, displacement, and the prioritization of economic gain over human welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2026.2627158
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The paradox of plenty: tenure insecurity and grassroots resistance in How Beautiful We Were by Imbolo Mbue

Uma Devi. S, Prajeesh Tomy
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

The paradox of plenty: tenure insecurity and grassroots resistance in How Beautiful We Were by Imbolo Mbue

Uma Devi. S, Prajeesh Tomy
article en

Abstract

This article examines Imbolo Mbue’s How Beautiful We Were through the lens of Ulrich Beck’s Risk Society theory and the concept of ecological grief, illustrating how oil extraction leads to environmental devastation, tenure insecurity, community resistance, and psychological harm. Set in the fictional African village of Kosawa, Mbue’s novel critiques the roles of governments and corporate companies in perpetuating a risk society, inequality, and environmental injustice. Grounded in Beck’s theory of Risk Society, this study critically analyses the risks created by modern industrial and political systems. Furthermore, the analysis reveals how these manufactured risks contribute to inequalities that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Through its narrative, the novel captures the dynamics of a risk society, showing how natural resource exploitation fosters grassroots activism and challenges hegemonic authority. In addition, the concept of ecological grief was employed to analyze the affective consequences of environmental destruction. Through a comprehensive examination of characters and narrative structures, this study explores how the community suffers from industrial expansion while also resisting corporate exploitation. In conclusion, this study contributes to African environmental literature by revealing how extractive practices in ‘resource-curse’ regions mirror the real-world problems of inequality, displacement, and the prioritization of economic gain over human welfare.

Cogent Arts and HumanitiesVol. 13(1)
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.