Fostering High‐Quality Engagement in Nature Recovery: Towards a De‐reification of Environmental Land Management

ABSTRACT Financial incentives go a long way in securing land manager participation in environmental programmes. They are nevertheless limited in their capacity to influence the quality of engagement with nature recovery actions. Drawing on responses from members of organisations active in nature conservation and restoration across four UK study sites—Devon and Cornwall, Peak District, East of England and the Scottish Highlands—we emphasise the importance of examining the conditions for high‐quality engagement in environmental programmes. We do so through a focus on land managers’ own relationships with the actions they take to recover nature, particularly the extent to which those actions are reified: treated as ends in themselves, rather than as means to the end (i.e., enhanced nature conservation and recovery). Using the concept of reification, we aim to show that the manner in which economic incentives are deployed in environmental programmes does not only influence participation but also the quality of land managers’ engagement in nature recovery. Reification therefore invites us to carefully consider how those incentives mediate the actions of land managers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologia Ruralis
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.70029
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering High‐Quality Engagement in Nature Recovery: Towards a De‐reification of Environmental Land Management

Caroline Nye, Charles Masquelier, Rebecca Wheeler, Matt Lobley et al.
Sociologia Ruralis
Forest Management and Policy
article

Fostering High‐Quality Engagement in Nature Recovery: Towards a De‐reification of Environmental Land Management

Caroline Nye, Charles Masquelier, Rebecca Wheeler, Matt Lobley, Carolyn Petersen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Financial incentives go a long way in securing land manager participation in environmental programmes. They are nevertheless limited in their capacity to influence the quality of engagement with nature recovery actions. Drawing on responses from members of organisations active in nature conservation and restoration across four UK study sites—Devon and Cornwall, Peak District, East of England and the Scottish Highlands—we emphasise the importance of examining the conditions for high‐quality engagement in environmental programmes. We do so through a focus on land managers’ own relationships with the actions they take to recover nature, particularly the extent to which those actions are reified: treated as ends in themselves, rather than as means to the end (i.e., enhanced nature conservation and recovery). Using the concept of reification, we aim to show that the manner in which economic incentives are deployed in environmental programmes does not only influence participation but also the quality of land managers’ engagement in nature recovery. Reification therefore invites us to carefully consider how those incentives mediate the actions of land managers.

Sociologia RuralisVol. 66(2)
University of Exeter (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fostering High‐Quality Engagement in Nature Recovery: Towards a De‐reification of Environmental Land Management — Caroline Nye, Charles Masquelier, et al. · Sociologia Ruralis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS