Euthanasia in Syria: an examination of medical student attitudes and predictors in a conflict zone

Euthanasia remains a contentious issue globally, with attitudes significantly shaped by cultural, religious, and societal factors. In Syria, over a decade of conflict has devastated the healthcare system and created unique ethical challenges for future physicians. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of Syrian medical students toward euthanasia and identify the key predictors influencing their views in a conflict, resource-deprived setting. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,509 medical students from four major Syrian universities using an online survey. The questionnaire included socio-demographic questions, the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, and five clinical scenarios depicting passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, orthothanasia, dysthanasia, and sedation. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square tests and binary logistic regression to identify predictors of agreement with different forms of euthanasia. A majority of students expressed disagreement with most forms of euthanasia, particularly passive euthanasia (78.3% disagreement) and active euthanasia (45.3% disagreement). Strikingly, 60.4% of students agreed with dysthanasia (futile, aggressive treatment). Binary logistic regression revealed that being male, identifying as atheist or Christian (compared to Muslim), and having lower religious commitment were significant predictors of agreement with euthanasia. Higher empathy scores were paradoxically associated with opposition to euthanasia but with support for dysthanasia. Age was a significant predictor only for dysthanasia, with younger students showing more agreement. Syrian medical students’ attitudes toward euthanasia are predominantly conservative, driven strongly by religious beliefs. The widespread support for dysthanasia and the paradoxical role of empathy highlight significant gaps in palliative and end-of-life care education. The unique pressures of the Syrian context, including systemic collapse and pervasive trauma, appear to foster moral distress that shapes these ethical viewpoints. Medical education in Syria must be reformed to include integrated palliative care training and psychological support to prepare students for the complex ethical realities of conflict medical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01402-w
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Euthanasia in Syria: an examination of medical student attitudes and predictors in a conflict zone

Houssein Nofal, Omran Janoud, Masa Watfa, Ahmad Al-Bitar et al.
BMC Medical Ethics
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Euthanasia in Syria: an examination of medical student attitudes and predictors in a conflict zone

Houssein Nofal, Omran Janoud, Masa Watfa, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Dana Alyassin, Ahmad Bishr Nasra, Alaa Alsarhan, Rawan Al-Deeb, Anas Nassr, Rami Al Shaaban
article en

Abstract

Euthanasia remains a contentious issue globally, with attitudes significantly shaped by cultural, religious, and societal factors. In Syria, over a decade of conflict has devastated the healthcare system and created unique ethical challenges for future physicians. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of Syrian medical students toward euthanasia and identify the key predictors influencing their views in a conflict, resource-deprived setting. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,509 medical students from four major Syrian universities using an online survey. The questionnaire included socio-demographic questions, the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, and five clinical scenarios depicting passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, orthothanasia, dysthanasia, and sedation. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square tests and binary logistic regression to identify predictors of agreement with different forms of euthanasia. A majority of students expressed disagreement with most forms of euthanasia, particularly passive euthanasia (78.3% disagreement) and active euthanasia (45.3% disagreement). Strikingly, 60.4% of students agreed with dysthanasia (futile, aggressive treatment). Binary logistic regression revealed that being male, identifying as atheist or Christian (compared to Muslim), and having lower religious commitment were significant predictors of agreement with euthanasia. Higher empathy scores were paradoxically associated with opposition to euthanasia but with support for dysthanasia. Age was a significant predictor only for dysthanasia, with younger students showing more agreement. Syrian medical students’ attitudes toward euthanasia are predominantly conservative, driven strongly by religious beliefs. The widespread support for dysthanasia and the paradoxical role of empathy highlight significant gaps in palliative and end-of-life care education. The unique pressures of the Syrian context, including systemic collapse and pervasive trauma, appear to foster moral distress that shapes these ethical viewpoints. Medical education in Syria must be reformed to include integrated palliative care training and psychological support to prepare students for the complex ethical realities of conflict medical practice.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 27(1)
University of Aleppo (SY), Latakia University (SY), Homs University (SY), Arab International University (SY), Syrian Private University (SY), Damascus University (SY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.