Cyclic performance of dual stage energy dissipation joints for connecting CFST column and exterior wide-flat beam

Based on the design concept of high energy dissipation and replaceability, as well as the specific characteristics of underground structures, such as difficulties and uncertainties in excavation, a dual stage energy dissipation joint for connection concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) column-exterior wide-flat beam joint was proposed in this paper. Three types of joints were designed and manufactured. Specifically, typical CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint (abbreviated as typical joint, TJ), frictional energy dissipation CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint (abbreviated as frictional energy dissipation joint, FEDJ), and dual stage energy dissipation CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint (abbreviated as dual stage energy dissipation joint, DEDJ). Then, quasi-static seismic performance tests and finite element analyses were conducted to these three joints. After that, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was used to assess the seismic performance of different types of joints. The results indicated that the DEDJ exhibited frictional and rotational energy dissipation characteristics under service level earthquakes, while demonstrating plastic deformation energy dissipation through metal components during design basis and maximal considered earthquakes. TJ showed bending failure at beam ends, whereas failure in DEDJ was concentrated in steel energy dissipation components. FDEJ remained undamaged throughout the test. TJ demonstrated high bearing capacity but suffered from poor ductility, rapid strength/stiffness degradation, and limited energy dissipation capacity. FDEJ maintained stable strength/stiffness with good ductility, though constrained by low bearing capacity and insufficient energy dissipation capability. DEDJ not only achieved the designed bearing capacity target but also synergistically combined advantages from both TJ and FDEJ, exhibiting superior ductility, effective energy dissipation, and slower strength and stiffness degradation compared to TJ. The assessment result of the TOPSIS method showed that the comprehensive performance of the DEDJ was better than that of TJ and FEDJ. the bearing capacity and energy dissipation capability of DEDJ may be compromised when the axial compression ratio increased to 0.5 and the end-to-center ratio of low-yield-point steel reached 1.82. • A novel dual stage energy dissipation joint for connection CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint was proposed. • The typical, frictional energy dissipation, and dual stage energy dissipation joint were evaluated using the TOPSIS method. • The seismic performance of the DEDJ under different parameters were studied by finite element method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122300
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyclic performance of dual stage energy dissipation joints for connecting CFST column and exterior wide-flat beam

Cheav Por Chea, Zhicheng Liu, Geng Yan, Mingyang Wei et al.
Engineering Structures
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Cyclic performance of dual stage energy dissipation joints for connecting CFST column and exterior wide-flat beam

Cheav Por Chea, Zhicheng Liu, Geng Yan, Mingyang Wei, Xueming Zhang, Dianwei Gao, Linlin Song, Jianhua Zhang
article en

Abstract

Based on the design concept of high energy dissipation and replaceability, as well as the specific characteristics of underground structures, such as difficulties and uncertainties in excavation, a dual stage energy dissipation joint for connection concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) column-exterior wide-flat beam joint was proposed in this paper. Three types of joints were designed and manufactured. Specifically, typical CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint (abbreviated as typical joint, TJ), frictional energy dissipation CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint (abbreviated as frictional energy dissipation joint, FEDJ), and dual stage energy dissipation CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint (abbreviated as dual stage energy dissipation joint, DEDJ). Then, quasi-static seismic performance tests and finite element analyses were conducted to these three joints. After that, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was used to assess the seismic performance of different types of joints. The results indicated that the DEDJ exhibited frictional and rotational energy dissipation characteristics under service level earthquakes, while demonstrating plastic deformation energy dissipation through metal components during design basis and maximal considered earthquakes. TJ showed bending failure at beam ends, whereas failure in DEDJ was concentrated in steel energy dissipation components. FDEJ remained undamaged throughout the test. TJ demonstrated high bearing capacity but suffered from poor ductility, rapid strength/stiffness degradation, and limited energy dissipation capacity. FDEJ maintained stable strength/stiffness with good ductility, though constrained by low bearing capacity and insufficient energy dissipation capability. DEDJ not only achieved the designed bearing capacity target but also synergistically combined advantages from both TJ and FDEJ, exhibiting superior ductility, effective energy dissipation, and slower strength and stiffness degradation compared to TJ. The assessment result of the TOPSIS method showed that the comprehensive performance of the DEDJ was better than that of TJ and FEDJ. the bearing capacity and energy dissipation capability of DEDJ may be compromised when the axial compression ratio increased to 0.5 and the end-to-center ratio of low-yield-point steel reached 1.82. • A novel dual stage energy dissipation joint for connection CFST column-exterior wide-flat beam joint was proposed. • The typical, frictional energy dissipation, and dual stage energy dissipation joint were evaluated using the TOPSIS method. • The seismic performance of the DEDJ under different parameters were studied by finite element method.

Engineering StructuresVol. 353
Harbin Engineering University (CN), Shenyang University of Technology (CN), Beijing Building Construction Research Institute (China) (CN), Monash University (AU), Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.