Global stratospheric methane loss from satellite observations

Stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation represents both an important sink in the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget and a major source of stratospheric water vapor and hydrogen radicals, exerting strong influences on global climate and ozone chemistry. Yet, the magnitude of stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> chemical loss remains highly uncertain, with previous estimates largely relying on chemistry-climate models (CCMs). Here, we present an observationally based estimate of stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> loss (<i>L<sub>STR</sub></i>), derived from the CH<sub>4</sub> diabatic flux across the isentropic surface fitted to the tropical tropopause, using satellite measurements of CH<sub>4</sub> concentration, temperature, and radiative heating rates for 2007-2010. We obtain an <i>L<sub>STR</sub></i> of 49.8 ± 7.8 Tg/y, compared with 38.1 Tg/y estimated from reanalysis, and 25.7 Tg/y (range: 19.6 to 35.9 Tg/y) derived from CCMs, indicating that both reanalysis and CCMs systematically underestimate stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> loss. We show that discrepancies in global CH<sub>4</sub> diabatic fluxes from the reanalysis and CCMs, when compared with observations, are mainly driven by biases in CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations and further enhanced by errors in temperature and radiative heating. Substituting our observational estimate for the model-based stratospheric loss in the bottom-up global CH<sub>4</sub> budget reduces the reported imbalance for the 2000s from 23 to 3 Tg/y, bringing it into close agreement with the 5 Tg/y (range: -4 to 13 Tg/y) imbalance inferred from top-down estimates. These findings highlight the critical role of observational constraints on <i>L<sub>STR</sub></i> in reconciling the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget. They also carry important implications for understanding stratospheric water vapor and ozone chemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2529774123
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global stratospheric methane loss from satellite observations

Cong Dong, Qiang Fu
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

Global stratospheric methane loss from satellite observations

Cong Dong, Qiang Fu
article en

Abstract

Stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation represents both an important sink in the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget and a major source of stratospheric water vapor and hydrogen radicals, exerting strong influences on global climate and ozone chemistry. Yet, the magnitude of stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> chemical loss remains highly uncertain, with previous estimates largely relying on chemistry-climate models (CCMs). Here, we present an observationally based estimate of stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> loss (<i>L<sub>STR</sub></i>), derived from the CH<sub>4</sub> diabatic flux across the isentropic surface fitted to the tropical tropopause, using satellite measurements of CH<sub>4</sub> concentration, temperature, and radiative heating rates for 2007-2010. We obtain an <i>L<sub>STR</sub></i> of 49.8 ± 7.8 Tg/y, compared with 38.1 Tg/y estimated from reanalysis, and 25.7 Tg/y (range: 19.6 to 35.9 Tg/y) derived from CCMs, indicating that both reanalysis and CCMs systematically underestimate stratospheric CH<sub>4</sub> loss. We show that discrepancies in global CH<sub>4</sub> diabatic fluxes from the reanalysis and CCMs, when compared with observations, are mainly driven by biases in CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations and further enhanced by errors in temperature and radiative heating. Substituting our observational estimate for the model-based stratospheric loss in the bottom-up global CH<sub>4</sub> budget reduces the reported imbalance for the 2000s from 23 to 3 Tg/y, bringing it into close agreement with the 5 Tg/y (range: -4 to 13 Tg/y) imbalance inferred from top-down estimates. These findings highlight the critical role of observational constraints on <i>L<sub>STR</sub></i> in reconciling the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget. They also carry important implications for understanding stratospheric water vapor and ozone chemistry.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(7)
University of Washington (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.