Firm Transparency of Risk Oversight: An Examination of Cybersecurity Governance Disclosures

ABSTRACT In this study, I examine board attributes associated with firm transparency of governance over cybersecurity risk (GCR). Using a sample of firms that report cybersecurity as a material risk, I hand collect GCR data from 8,384 proxy statements filed from 2019 to 2021. Surprisingly, I find that only 57 percent of the filings provide stakeholders information about GCR. In multivariate analysis, I find that a firm’s GCR disclosure is positively associated with board size, independence, information technology expertise, and those boards with a higher proportion of “busy” directors. I further find that boards with longer serving directors provide less GCR disclosure. Finally, I find increasing levels of GCR disclosure over the three-year period, suggesting that firms are responding to stakeholder demand for increased transparency. These findings should be helpful to firms looking to benchmark disclosure practices and to the SEC in evaluating the efficacy of existing cybersecurity disclosure guidance. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from the cited sources in the text. JEL Classifications: G32; G34; M15.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2024-012
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firm Transparency of Risk Oversight: An Examination of Cybersecurity Governance Disclosures

Laurie E. Ereddia
Journal of Information Systems
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Firm Transparency of Risk Oversight: An Examination of Cybersecurity Governance Disclosures

Laurie E. Ereddia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, I examine board attributes associated with firm transparency of governance over cybersecurity risk (GCR). Using a sample of firms that report cybersecurity as a material risk, I hand collect GCR data from 8,384 proxy statements filed from 2019 to 2021. Surprisingly, I find that only 57 percent of the filings provide stakeholders information about GCR. In multivariate analysis, I find that a firm’s GCR disclosure is positively associated with board size, independence, information technology expertise, and those boards with a higher proportion of “busy” directors. I further find that boards with longer serving directors provide less GCR disclosure. Finally, I find increasing levels of GCR disclosure over the three-year period, suggesting that firms are responding to stakeholder demand for increased transparency. These findings should be helpful to firms looking to benchmark disclosure practices and to the SEC in evaluating the efficacy of existing cybersecurity disclosure guidance. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from the cited sources in the text. JEL Classifications: G32; G34; M15.

Journal of Information Systems
Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.