Transaction Governance: Firm-Level Influences and the Organizational Identity Paradox

We propose a conceptual framework of transaction governance that augments the existing transaction cost economics (TCE) model with research on organizational identity orientation. Our focus is on how particular identity orientations imply preferences for formal versus informal governance mechanisms. These preferences, in turn, are activated when a firm faces particular transaction hazards. In general, the identity orientation construct augments the current perspective on governance choice and helps expand the current TCE model. We also discuss how a firm’s identity orientation is itself systematically shaped (strengthened or weakened) by transactional outcomes. These feedback processes involve certain paradoxes. For instance, even successfully governed transactions may actually weaken a firm’s identity orientation, to the extent that the governance choice is incompatible with the firm’s prevailing identity orientation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Review
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0064
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transaction Governance: Firm-Level Influences and the Organizational Identity Paradox

Jan B. Heide, Paul Tracey, Simon J. Bell
Academy of Management Review
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Transaction Governance: Firm-Level Influences and the Organizational Identity Paradox

Jan B. Heide, Paul Tracey, Simon J. Bell
article en

Abstract

We propose a conceptual framework of transaction governance that augments the existing transaction cost economics (TCE) model with research on organizational identity orientation. Our focus is on how particular identity orientations imply preferences for formal versus informal governance mechanisms. These preferences, in turn, are activated when a firm faces particular transaction hazards. In general, the identity orientation construct augments the current perspective on governance choice and helps expand the current TCE model. We also discuss how a firm’s identity orientation is itself systematically shaped (strengthened or weakened) by transactional outcomes. These feedback processes involve certain paradoxes. For instance, even successfully governed transactions may actually weaken a firm’s identity orientation, to the extent that the governance choice is incompatible with the firm’s prevailing identity orientation.

Academy of Management Review
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.