Aggregation-dependent epitope sequence and modification fingerprints of anti-Aβ antibodies

A hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is the progressive accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides across distinct brain regions. Anti-Aβ antibodies (Aβ-Abs) targeting specific Aβ variants are essential tools for AD research, diagnostics, and therapy. The monoclonal antibodies Aducanumab, Lecanemab, and Donanemab have recently been approved as the first disease-modifying treatments for early AD, highlighting the clinical importance of their exact binding profiles. In this study, we systematically characterized the binding and modification requirements of 20 Aβ-Abs, including biosimilars of Aducanumab, Lecanemab, and Donanemab, across monomeric, oligomeric, and aggregated Aβ forms. Array-based analysis of 20,000 modified Aβ peptides defined binding epitopes at single-residue resolution and revealed the impact of sequence variation, including familial AD mutations, as well as diverse post-translational modifications (PTMs). Notably, genetic variants, such as H6R, impaired binding of therapeutic Aβ-Abs like Aducanumab. Donanemab showed strong preference for pyroglutamate-modified AβpE3–17, while Lecanemab and Aducanumab exhibited aggregation- and sequence-context-dependent binding requirements. Comparison of peptide binding profiles with binding of full-length and aggregated Aβ via immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, capillary immunoassays, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry on AD brain tissue revealed distinct aggregation-dependent binding behaviours. The valency- and context-dependence of Aducanumab binding, together with its preference for Ser8-phosphorylated Aβ, supports a dimerization-mediated binding mechanism. For Lecanemab, our data suggest that additional structural contributions beyond the minimal N-terminal epitope are required for binding to aggregated Aβ, which remain to be fully resolved. Together, this work provides the most comprehensive dataset to date on aggregation-dependent sequence and modification selectivity of Aβ-Abs. By integrating mutational, PTM, and aggregation contexts in a unified experimental framework, we establish a resource that enables rational selection of antibodies for research and diagnostic applications and offers mechanistic insights that may inform the design and optimization of future therapeutic antibodies in AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eLife
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.106156.3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aggregation-dependent epitope sequence and modification fingerprints of anti-Aβ antibodies

Jochen Walter, Hermann Schindelin, Olaf Jahn, Oliver Wirths et al.
1 citations
eLife
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
32.84
article

Aggregation-dependent epitope sequence and modification fingerprints of anti-Aβ antibodies

Jochen Walter, Hermann Schindelin, Olaf Jahn, Oliver Wirths, Bárbara Morgado, Thomas Liepold, Mohammed Mehedi Hassan, Timon Leske, Jens Wiltfang, Sebastian Bothe, Hans-Wolfgang Klafki, Ivan Talucci, Hans Michael Maric, Lars van Werven, Annik Steiert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is the progressive accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides across distinct brain regions. Anti-Aβ antibodies (Aβ-Abs) targeting specific Aβ variants are essential tools for AD research, diagnostics, and therapy. The monoclonal antibodies Aducanumab, Lecanemab, and Donanemab have recently been approved as the first disease-modifying treatments for early AD, highlighting the clinical importance of their exact binding profiles. In this study, we systematically characterized the binding and modification requirements of 20 Aβ-Abs, including biosimilars of Aducanumab, Lecanemab, and Donanemab, across monomeric, oligomeric, and aggregated Aβ forms. Array-based analysis of 20,000 modified Aβ peptides defined binding epitopes at single-residue resolution and revealed the impact of sequence variation, including familial AD mutations, as well as diverse post-translational modifications (PTMs). Notably, genetic variants, such as H6R, impaired binding of therapeutic Aβ-Abs like Aducanumab. Donanemab showed strong preference for pyroglutamate-modified AβpE3–17, while Lecanemab and Aducanumab exhibited aggregation- and sequence-context-dependent binding requirements. Comparison of peptide binding profiles with binding of full-length and aggregated Aβ via immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, capillary immunoassays, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry on AD brain tissue revealed distinct aggregation-dependent binding behaviours. The valency- and context-dependence of Aducanumab binding, together with its preference for Ser8-phosphorylated Aβ, supports a dimerization-mediated binding mechanism. For Lecanemab, our data suggest that additional structural contributions beyond the minimal N-terminal epitope are required for binding to aggregated Aβ, which remain to be fully resolved. Together, this work provides the most comprehensive dataset to date on aggregation-dependent sequence and modification selectivity of Aβ-Abs. By integrating mutational, PTM, and aggregation contexts in a unified experimental framework, we establish a resource that enables rational selection of antibodies for research and diagnostic applications and offers mechanistic insights that may inform the design and optimization of future therapeutic antibodies in AD.

eLifeVol. 14
University Hospital Bonn (DE), Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IT), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
32.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.