DEFECATION POSTURE – SITTING VERSUS SQUATTING

Background: Despite emerging debates on what should constitute a recommended defecation posture the research in this area has been mostly non-conclusive. In the countries of Europe, America, Australia the sitting position forced by a design of water toilet prevails while in many Asia and Africa countries the squatting posture dominates. The postures have their distinctive impact on digestive, musculoskeletal, and overall body health. Both of them have advantages and disadvantages. Aim: This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate previous research on the defecation posture. The comparison of changing the defecation position from squatting to sitting was performed and its effects analysed. Material and methods: A search of relevant research databases was conducted as well as a hand search of selected journals to identify eligible papers. Results: A total of 20 studies were reviewed and results indicated a mean prevalence rate of sitting posture between 10%–24%. Findings also indicated correlates such as the presence of health problems related to the defecation posture. Most studies showed poor external validity, with the majority of them scoring high on risk of bias. Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate inconsistencies in terms of methodology and diagnostic criteria of health problems related to defecation posture. Further research in this area using long-term clinical trials to avoid biases is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4125
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEFECATION POSTURE – SITTING VERSUS SQUATTING

Tytus Tyralik, Grzegorz Zalewski, Izabella Michalska, Natalia Glanc et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

DEFECATION POSTURE – SITTING VERSUS SQUATTING

Tytus Tyralik, Grzegorz Zalewski, Izabella Michalska, Natalia Glanc, Justyna Niebylecka, Mateusz Myśliwiec, Julia Kular, Maciej Karwat, Dominik Sendecki, Oliwia Malec
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite emerging debates on what should constitute a recommended defecation posture the research in this area has been mostly non-conclusive. In the countries of Europe, America, Australia the sitting position forced by a design of water toilet prevails while in many Asia and Africa countries the squatting posture dominates. The postures have their distinctive impact on digestive, musculoskeletal, and overall body health. Both of them have advantages and disadvantages. Aim: This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate previous research on the defecation posture. The comparison of changing the defecation position from squatting to sitting was performed and its effects analysed. Material and methods: A search of relevant research databases was conducted as well as a hand search of selected journals to identify eligible papers. Results: A total of 20 studies were reviewed and results indicated a mean prevalence rate of sitting posture between 10%–24%. Findings also indicated correlates such as the presence of health problems related to the defecation posture. Most studies showed poor external validity, with the majority of them scoring high on risk of bias. Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate inconsistencies in terms of methodology and diagnostic criteria of health problems related to defecation posture. Further research in this area using long-term clinical trials to avoid biases is recommended.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 4(4(48))
Jagiellonian University (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Cracow University of Technology (PL), Ministry of the Interior (EE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.