DEFECATION POSTURE – SITTING VERSUS SQUATTING
Background: Despite emerging debates on what should constitute a recommended defecation posture the research in this area has been mostly non-conclusive. In the countries of Europe, America, Australia the sitting position forced by a design of water toilet prevails while in many Asia and Africa countries the squatting posture dominates. The postures have their distinctive impact on digestive, musculoskeletal, and overall body health. Both of them have advantages and disadvantages. Aim: This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate previous research on the defecation posture. The comparison of changing the defecation position from squatting to sitting was performed and its effects analysed. Material and methods: A search of relevant research databases was conducted as well as a hand search of selected journals to identify eligible papers. Results: A total of 20 studies were reviewed and results indicated a mean prevalence rate of sitting posture between 10%–24%. Findings also indicated correlates such as the presence of health problems related to the defecation posture. Most studies showed poor external validity, with the majority of them scoring high on risk of bias. Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate inconsistencies in terms of methodology and diagnostic criteria of health problems related to defecation posture. Further research in this area using long-term clinical trials to avoid biases is recommended.
Authors
- Tytus Tyralik
- Grzegorz Zalewski
- Izabella Michalska
- Natalia Glanc
- Justyna Niebylecka
- Mateusz Myśliwiec
- Julia Kular
- Maciej Karwat
- Dominik Sendecki
- Oliwia Malec
Institutions
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- Medical University of Silesia (PL)
- Cracow University of Technology (PL)
- Ministry of the Interior (EE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
- Published
- 2025-12-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4125
- Primary Topic
- Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00