Integrating the behavior change wheel and co-design approach in selecting strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural women living with HIV in Eastern Uganda

Women living with HIV (WLHIV) require more frequent cervical cancer screening than HIV negative women. However, uptake of cervical cancer screening services integrated into HIV care at most rural public health facilities in Eastern Uganda is low, below 50%. This is attributed to low cervical cancer screening literacy among rural WLHIV: limited ability to access, understand, and apply cervical cancer screening information. There is a need for evidence-based, context-specific, theory-informed strategies that target multi-level barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer literacy among these women. This study used research evidence, theory, and stakeholder engagement in selecting strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural WLHIV. This qualitative study applied research evidence to the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and co-design approach. The eight steps of the BCW included: 1) defining the problem in behavioral terms, 2) selecting the target behavior, 3) specifying the target behavior, 4) identifying what needs to change, 5) identifying intervention functions, 6) identifying policy categories, 7) identifying Behavior Change Techniques (BCT), and 8) identifying the mode of delivery. We conducted four parallel co-design sessions with 12 health care providers and 16 rural women at steps 3 and 4 of the BCW. We formulated eighteen behavioral targets that were linked to all Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) behavioral determinants. Nine behavioral targets were selected under the education, persuasion, enablement, and training intervention functions, as well as the communication/marketing and service provision policy categories. We identified ten most appropriate BCTs and four modes of delivery, which translated into four strategies, namely: 1) trained cervical cancer screening peer educators, 2) cervical cancer screening education video, 3) improved cervical cancer screening IEC charts, and 4) train midwives to prepare small portions of acetic acid for individual patient screening. The BCW provided a comprehensive framework that integrated a co-design approach and applied research evidence in selecting context-specific and feasible strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural WLHIV. Future research is needed to design and evaluate these strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14152-7
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating the behavior change wheel and co-design approach in selecting strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural women living with HIV in Eastern Uganda

Aggrey Semeere, Miriam Nakalembe, Miriam Laker‐Oketta, Ms. Juliana Namutundu et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Integrating the behavior change wheel and co-design approach in selecting strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural women living with HIV in Eastern Uganda

Aggrey Semeere, Miriam Nakalembe, Miriam Laker‐Oketta, Ms. Juliana Namutundu, Fred C. Semitala, Joan Nangendo, Rhoda K. Wanyenze, Edith Nakku-Joloba, Juliet Kiguli
article en

Abstract

Women living with HIV (WLHIV) require more frequent cervical cancer screening than HIV negative women. However, uptake of cervical cancer screening services integrated into HIV care at most rural public health facilities in Eastern Uganda is low, below 50%. This is attributed to low cervical cancer screening literacy among rural WLHIV: limited ability to access, understand, and apply cervical cancer screening information. There is a need for evidence-based, context-specific, theory-informed strategies that target multi-level barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer literacy among these women. This study used research evidence, theory, and stakeholder engagement in selecting strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural WLHIV. This qualitative study applied research evidence to the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and co-design approach. The eight steps of the BCW included: 1) defining the problem in behavioral terms, 2) selecting the target behavior, 3) specifying the target behavior, 4) identifying what needs to change, 5) identifying intervention functions, 6) identifying policy categories, 7) identifying Behavior Change Techniques (BCT), and 8) identifying the mode of delivery. We conducted four parallel co-design sessions with 12 health care providers and 16 rural women at steps 3 and 4 of the BCW. We formulated eighteen behavioral targets that were linked to all Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) behavioral determinants. Nine behavioral targets were selected under the education, persuasion, enablement, and training intervention functions, as well as the communication/marketing and service provision policy categories. We identified ten most appropriate BCTs and four modes of delivery, which translated into four strategies, namely: 1) trained cervical cancer screening peer educators, 2) cervical cancer screening education video, 3) improved cervical cancer screening IEC charts, and 4) train midwives to prepare small portions of acetic acid for individual patient screening. The BCW provided a comprehensive framework that integrated a co-design approach and applied research evidence in selecting context-specific and feasible strategies for improving cervical cancer screening literacy among rural WLHIV. Future research is needed to design and evaluate these strategies.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Infectious Diseases Institute (UG), Makerere University (UG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.