Science Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A National Survey of Elementary Special Education Teachers

Elementary students with learning disabilities (LDs) often have limited opportunities to learn science, and little is known about how special educators engage in science instruction. This study drew on a nationally representative survey of elementary special education teachers to describe their roles, preparedness, time allocation, and perceived barriers. Most teachers reported minimal discipline-specific preparation and felt less prepared to teach science than other subjects. Many noted that students with LDs often missed science classes because of pull-out instruction. Common barriers to students receiving science instruction included remediation priorities and accountability pressures in tested subjects. These findings provide a national snapshot of science instruction for elementary students with LDs and point to the need for greater teacher preparation and policy support to ensure access to high-quality science learning for students with LDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982261416149
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A National Survey of Elementary Special Education Teachers

Rachel Juergensen, Erica S. Lembke, Reagan Murnan, Shannon Budin et al.
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Science Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A National Survey of Elementary Special Education Teachers

Rachel Juergensen, Erica S. Lembke, Reagan Murnan, Shannon Budin, Elizabeth A. Swanson, Qing Liu, Jennifer L. Chiu, William J. Therrien, Christian T. Doabler, K. Davis, Jenna Gersib, Eunsoo Cho, Sheila J. Conway, Amelia K. Moody, Sarah J. Conoyer, Zaira Jimenez, Priscilla B. Brame, Cherish M. Sarmiento, Jared R. Morris, Sharlene A. Kiuhara, Christina Taylor, Chen Ling, Vivian Chi-Woon Taam Wong, Cassandra M. Smith, B L Cook, Heidi R. Stinchcomb, Bruna F. Gonçalves, Victoria Koop, Michael Solis, R. Alex Smith, Michael N. Faggella-Luby, Michael W. Dunn
article en

Abstract

Elementary students with learning disabilities (LDs) often have limited opportunities to learn science, and little is known about how special educators engage in science instruction. This study drew on a nationally representative survey of elementary special education teachers to describe their roles, preparedness, time allocation, and perceived barriers. Most teachers reported minimal discipline-specific preparation and felt less prepared to teach science than other subjects. Many noted that students with LDs often missed science classes because of pull-out instruction. Common barriers to students receiving science instruction included remediation priorities and accountability pressures in tested subjects. These findings provide a national snapshot of science instruction for elementary students with LDs and point to the need for greater teacher preparation and policy support to ensure access to high-quality science learning for students with LDs.

Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeVol. 41(2)
Brigham Young University (US), University of California, Riverside (US), Buffalo State University (US), Delaware State University (US), Texas Christian University (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Washington State University Vancouver (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Utah (US), Jones College (US), Wichita State University (US), University of Virginia's College at Wise (US), University of Virginia (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), University of Missouri (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US), University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.