Endogenous innovation and change: community agency in two case studies in Ghana

Agricultural innovations have often been framed within a narrow, modernist narrative of technological modernisation and yield improvements–economic targets that often do not take the needs and knowledges of local communities into account. We therefore propose to re-define the term as ‘endogenous innovation’ to emphasise community agency and epistemic empowerment, in analogy with endogenous development processes. We analyse case studies in Ghana in the Upper East and Bono East region, where we find empirical examples of endogenous innovations in the making. These require endogenous infrastructure that create decision-making spaces for farmers, mediators who bridge diverse knowledges, and epistemic justice. The notion of endogenous innovation therefore disrupts the vision of who counts as an ‘innovator’ in innovation processes by highlighting the epistemic agency of communities and opens up new ways of thinking about change that is more aligned with the needs and perspectives of local communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2026.2619223
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endogenous innovation and change: community agency in two case studies in Ghana

Lydia Kwoyiga, Joost Dessein, Branwen Peddi, David S. Ludwig
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

Endogenous innovation and change: community agency in two case studies in Ghana

Lydia Kwoyiga, Joost Dessein, Branwen Peddi, David S. Ludwig
article en

Abstract

Agricultural innovations have often been framed within a narrow, modernist narrative of technological modernisation and yield improvements–economic targets that often do not take the needs and knowledges of local communities into account. We therefore propose to re-define the term as ‘endogenous innovation’ to emphasise community agency and epistemic empowerment, in analogy with endogenous development processes. We analyse case studies in Ghana in the Upper East and Bono East region, where we find empirical examples of endogenous innovations in the making. These require endogenous infrastructure that create decision-making spaces for farmers, mediators who bridge diverse knowledges, and epistemic justice. The notion of endogenous innovation therefore disrupts the vision of who counts as an ‘innovator’ in innovation processes by highlighting the epistemic agency of communities and opens up new ways of thinking about change that is more aligned with the needs and perspectives of local communities.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 13(1)
Ghent University (BE), University for Development Studies (GH), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Endogenous innovation and change: community agency in two case studies in Ghana — Lydia Kwoyiga, Joost Dessein, et al. · Journal of Responsible Innovation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS