A Review of the Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes of Tibial-Sided Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

» Tibial fixation remains the biomechanically weaker site in ACL reconstruction due to lower bone density and directional loading forces, making fixation choice critical for graft stability.» Interference screws provide aperture fixation close to the joint line but are limited by graft slippage, tunnel widening, and progressive loss of tension over time.» Suspensory devices engage cortical bone and reduce graft damage during insertion; when supplemented with backup fixation, such as knotless suture anchors, they demonstrate greater fixation strength and reduced graft micromotion.» Internal suture augmentation offers promising biomechanical and early clinical benefits by protecting the graft during the vulnerable early healing period, especially in young athletes and revision cases, though long-term effects remain under investigation.» Fixation strategy should be individualized, balancing graft choice, bone quality, and rehabilitation demands to optimize outcomes and reduce risk of failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBJS Reviews
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.25.00186
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of the Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes of Tibial-Sided Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clayton W. Nuelle, Steven F. DeFroda, Rhett Wakefield, Garrett R. Jackson
JBJS Reviews
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

A Review of the Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes of Tibial-Sided Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clayton W. Nuelle, Steven F. DeFroda, Rhett Wakefield, Garrett R. Jackson
article en

Abstract

» Tibial fixation remains the biomechanically weaker site in ACL reconstruction due to lower bone density and directional loading forces, making fixation choice critical for graft stability.» Interference screws provide aperture fixation close to the joint line but are limited by graft slippage, tunnel widening, and progressive loss of tension over time.» Suspensory devices engage cortical bone and reduce graft damage during insertion; when supplemented with backup fixation, such as knotless suture anchors, they demonstrate greater fixation strength and reduced graft micromotion.» Internal suture augmentation offers promising biomechanical and early clinical benefits by protecting the graft during the vulnerable early healing period, especially in young athletes and revision cases, though long-term effects remain under investigation.» Fixation strategy should be individualized, balancing graft choice, bone quality, and rehabilitation demands to optimize outcomes and reduce risk of failure.

JBJS ReviewsVol. 14(2)
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Review of the Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes of Tibial-Sided Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction — Clayton W. Nuelle, Steven F. DeFroda, et al. · JBJS Reviews (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS