Long-term monitoring reveals extensive variability in stream and riparian response to wildfires across the inland Pacific Northwest

ABSTRACT Objective Wildland fires in the western United States have grown larger and more intense over the past half century. These fires directly and indirectly affect riparian zones and streams, altering a variety of vegetative and stream conditions. However, current understanding of fire impacts to stream conditions depends on—and may be biased by—which streams were burned and studied in the past. For example, past research has been disproportionately focused on catchments that experienced high-severity wildfire resulting in dramatic postfire instream responses. In this study, we aim to provide a broader context for how wildland fires ranging in size (from 405 to ≥200,000 ha) and severity (from low to high) alter the near-stream and instream environment by analyzing stream and riparian data collected in 227 catchments both before and after fire occurrence. Methods We used paired t-tests to identify significant differences in stream and riparian habitats pre- and postfire. We then constructed linear models to assess whether fire severity and the proportion of the upstream catchment burned, obtained from the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity program, help to explain variation in postfire responses. Landscape covariates, including precipitation, elevation, and stream gradient, were also incorporated into linear models to assess their ability to explain postfire stream response. Results On average, stream conditions changed in a manner consistent with previous research (e.g., increased water temperature, sediment loading, and wood accumulation). However, we observed extensive variation in the direction and magnitude of postfire responses in stream and riparian habitat conditions. The extent and severity of wildfire were major predictors for vegetative cover and stream temperature but were less important for other stream habitat variables, such as large wood and fine sediment. Conclusions Stream responses to fire in the inland Pacific Northwest are highly variable and difficult to predict based on wildfire characteristics alone. The observed variability in stream response led to changes in stream and riparian habitats that were both favorable (e.g., increases in woody debris) and potentially detrimental (e.g., increased sediment loading) for fish native to the inland Pacific Northwest. A better understanding of how stream channels and riparian zones respond to fire will help managers in determining when intervention and resources may be needed to protect important aquatic habitats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tafafs/vnaf060
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term monitoring reveals extensive variability in stream and riparian response to wildfires across the inland Pacific Northwest

Brett B. Roper, James D. Feller, Kristin Armstrong, Andrew Van Wagenen et al.
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Long-term monitoring reveals extensive variability in stream and riparian response to wildfires across the inland Pacific Northwest

Brett B. Roper, James D. Feller, Kristin Armstrong, Andrew Van Wagenen, W Carl Saunders
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Wildland fires in the western United States have grown larger and more intense over the past half century. These fires directly and indirectly affect riparian zones and streams, altering a variety of vegetative and stream conditions. However, current understanding of fire impacts to stream conditions depends on—and may be biased by—which streams were burned and studied in the past. For example, past research has been disproportionately focused on catchments that experienced high-severity wildfire resulting in dramatic postfire instream responses. In this study, we aim to provide a broader context for how wildland fires ranging in size (from 405 to ≥200,000 ha) and severity (from low to high) alter the near-stream and instream environment by analyzing stream and riparian data collected in 227 catchments both before and after fire occurrence. Methods We used paired t-tests to identify significant differences in stream and riparian habitats pre- and postfire. We then constructed linear models to assess whether fire severity and the proportion of the upstream catchment burned, obtained from the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity program, help to explain variation in postfire responses. Landscape covariates, including precipitation, elevation, and stream gradient, were also incorporated into linear models to assess their ability to explain postfire stream response. Results On average, stream conditions changed in a manner consistent with previous research (e.g., increased water temperature, sediment loading, and wood accumulation). However, we observed extensive variation in the direction and magnitude of postfire responses in stream and riparian habitat conditions. The extent and severity of wildfire were major predictors for vegetative cover and stream temperature but were less important for other stream habitat variables, such as large wood and fine sediment. Conclusions Stream responses to fire in the inland Pacific Northwest are highly variable and difficult to predict based on wildfire characteristics alone. The observed variability in stream response led to changes in stream and riparian habitats that were both favorable (e.g., increases in woody debris) and potentially detrimental (e.g., increased sediment loading) for fish native to the inland Pacific Northwest. A better understanding of how stream channels and riparian zones respond to fire will help managers in determining when intervention and resources may be needed to protect important aquatic habitats.

Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyVol. 155(2)
Utah State University (US), US Forest Service (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.