Impact of Countermeasures against Galloping Wind Instability Using Variously Shaped Bridge Decks

Cyclones, distinguished by their extreme wind hazards, are among the most severe natural phenomena, causing extensive destruction across large geographical areas where they occur. The impact of cyclones is particularly critical in structural engineering, where phenomena such as wind-induced galloping in bridge decks demand rigorous aerodynamic analysis to ensure stability and safety. This study examines the effectiveness of various passive aerodynamic countermeasures in mitigating galloping instability across different bridge deck shapes, including streamlined, semi-streamlined, bluff-shaped, and thin plate designs. The aerodynamic performance of each deck shape has been analyzed under different wind conditions using computational simulations. Results show that streamlined decks are the most resistant to galloping, followed by passive countermeasure designs, while thin plates exhibit the highest susceptibility to instability. These findings highlight the significance of deck shape and aerodynamic design in mitigating galloping instability. The study concludes that tailored passive aerodynamic countermeasures can substantially enhance bridge stability, effectively mitigating wind-induced risks and improving long-term safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2468
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Countermeasures against Galloping Wind Instability Using Variously Shaped Bridge Decks

Puja Haldar, Somnath Karmakar
Natural Hazards Review
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
article

Impact of Countermeasures against Galloping Wind Instability Using Variously Shaped Bridge Decks

Puja Haldar, Somnath Karmakar
article en

Abstract

Cyclones, distinguished by their extreme wind hazards, are among the most severe natural phenomena, causing extensive destruction across large geographical areas where they occur. The impact of cyclones is particularly critical in structural engineering, where phenomena such as wind-induced galloping in bridge decks demand rigorous aerodynamic analysis to ensure stability and safety. This study examines the effectiveness of various passive aerodynamic countermeasures in mitigating galloping instability across different bridge deck shapes, including streamlined, semi-streamlined, bluff-shaped, and thin plate designs. The aerodynamic performance of each deck shape has been analyzed under different wind conditions using computational simulations. Results show that streamlined decks are the most resistant to galloping, followed by passive countermeasure designs, while thin plates exhibit the highest susceptibility to instability. These findings highlight the significance of deck shape and aerodynamic design in mitigating galloping instability. The study concludes that tailored passive aerodynamic countermeasures can substantially enhance bridge stability, effectively mitigating wind-induced risks and improving long-term safety.

Natural Hazards ReviewVol. 27(2)
National Institute of Technology Durgapur (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Countermeasures against Galloping Wind Instability Using Variously Shaped Bridge Decks — Puja Haldar, Somnath Karmakar · Natural Hazards Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS