Grounding distractor inhibition in action control: Implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent

Spatial selective attention is typically thought to act as a sensory filter: prioritizing the processing of relevant information at a particular location in space over that of irrelevant information. Research using dynamic setups, rather than standard static laboratory setups with seated observers, however, shows that spatial selective attention does not simply facilitate sensory processing at a particular location (where), but also involves the planning of how to (covertly) sample that information from the agent's perspective. That is, spatial selective attention is constrained by sensorimotor processing and includes an action component. Here we ask whether this extends to the flipside of target selection: whether the suppression of irrelevant distractors is similarly viewer dependent. In three experiments (one preregistered), participants performed an additional-singleton visual search task in which a salient distractor could occur more often at one of the search locations (unknown to the participant). Critically, participants conducted the visual search on a monitor positioned flat on a tabletop so that we could manipulate their standing position. This enabled us to disentangle whether implicit distractor-location learning is anchored in world coordinates or incorporates information as to how one can suppress attentional sampling in space from their viewpoint to prevent distraction. Across all three experiments, we found that implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent when embedded in active behavior. These findings show that learning to inhibit distractors sometimes cannot be abstracted from the agent and how they can suppress sampling the world from their perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106480
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grounding distractor inhibition in action control: Implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent

Freek van Ede, Chris Jungerius, Litian Chen, Heleen A. Slagter
Cognition
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Grounding distractor inhibition in action control: Implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent

Freek van Ede, Chris Jungerius, Litian Chen, Heleen A. Slagter
article en

Abstract

Spatial selective attention is typically thought to act as a sensory filter: prioritizing the processing of relevant information at a particular location in space over that of irrelevant information. Research using dynamic setups, rather than standard static laboratory setups with seated observers, however, shows that spatial selective attention does not simply facilitate sensory processing at a particular location (where), but also involves the planning of how to (covertly) sample that information from the agent's perspective. That is, spatial selective attention is constrained by sensorimotor processing and includes an action component. Here we ask whether this extends to the flipside of target selection: whether the suppression of irrelevant distractors is similarly viewer dependent. In three experiments (one preregistered), participants performed an additional-singleton visual search task in which a salient distractor could occur more often at one of the search locations (unknown to the participant). Critically, participants conducted the visual search on a monitor positioned flat on a tabletop so that we could manipulate their standing position. This enabled us to disentangle whether implicit distractor-location learning is anchored in world coordinates or incorporates information as to how one can suppress attentional sampling in space from their viewpoint to prevent distraction. Across all three experiments, we found that implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent when embedded in active behavior. These findings show that learning to inhibit distractors sometimes cannot be abstracted from the agent and how they can suppress sampling the world from their perspective.

CognitionVol. 271
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Grounding distractor inhibition in action control: Implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent — Freek van Ede, Chris Jungerius, et al. · Cognition (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS