Primary Na contents of kimberlite melts from experimentally determined olivine/melt partition coefficients

Kimberlite rocks are rich in Ca, yet almost Na-free (<0.3 wt% Na2O), raising the question of whether they tap a unique Na-poor but clinopyroxene-saturated mantle source or whether Na is lost en route to the surface. To reconstruct primary Na contents of kimberlitic melts, we quantified Na partitioning between olivine and volatile-rich kimberlitic melts (Note: abstract contains math symbols that cannot be translated here; see PDF). Applying this calibration to magmatic olivine from 22 kimberlites yields reconstructed Na2Omelt of 1.9−8.6 wt% (typically ±0.25 wt%) at 1 GPa, showing that magmatic Na contents are much higher than indicated by bulk rock measurements. The lower range of these reconstructed Na2O values aligns with the predicted 3.5 ± 0.5 wt% of asthenospheric carbonated silicate melts generated from typical lherzolitic mantle at 7 GPa. The higher values correspond to the same 3.5 ± 0.5 wt% if recalculated for olivine crystallization at 2−4 GPa. Because Na2O loss through fluid exsolution during kimberlite ascent cannot exceed 0.5 wt%, the extreme Na loss leading to the observed low bulk-kimberlite values must occur upon solidification when copious amounts of Na-rich fluids are expelled. These findings suggest that kimberlitic melts do not require a peculiar mantle source, but rather carbon-bearing fertile lherzolites that melt at adiabatic conditions, placing kimberlites into a broad continuum with primitive alkaline ocean island melts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geology
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/g54051.1
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary Na contents of kimberlite melts from experimentally determined olivine/melt partition coefficients

Max W. Schmidt, Rebecca F. Zech, Andrea Giuliani
Geology
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Primary Na contents of kimberlite melts from experimentally determined olivine/melt partition coefficients

Max W. Schmidt, Rebecca F. Zech, Andrea Giuliani
article en

Abstract

Kimberlite rocks are rich in Ca, yet almost Na-free (<0.3 wt% Na2O), raising the question of whether they tap a unique Na-poor but clinopyroxene-saturated mantle source or whether Na is lost en route to the surface. To reconstruct primary Na contents of kimberlitic melts, we quantified Na partitioning between olivine and volatile-rich kimberlitic melts (Note: abstract contains math symbols that cannot be translated here; see PDF). Applying this calibration to magmatic olivine from 22 kimberlites yields reconstructed Na2Omelt of 1.9−8.6 wt% (typically ±0.25 wt%) at 1 GPa, showing that magmatic Na contents are much higher than indicated by bulk rock measurements. The lower range of these reconstructed Na2O values aligns with the predicted 3.5 ± 0.5 wt% of asthenospheric carbonated silicate melts generated from typical lherzolitic mantle at 7 GPa. The higher values correspond to the same 3.5 ± 0.5 wt% if recalculated for olivine crystallization at 2−4 GPa. Because Na2O loss through fluid exsolution during kimberlite ascent cannot exceed 0.5 wt%, the extreme Na loss leading to the observed low bulk-kimberlite values must occur upon solidification when copious amounts of Na-rich fluids are expelled. These findings suggest that kimberlitic melts do not require a peculiar mantle source, but rather carbon-bearing fertile lherzolites that melt at adiabatic conditions, placing kimberlites into a broad continuum with primitive alkaline ocean island melts.

Geology
Carnegie Institution for Science (US), ETH Zurich (CH)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.