Evaluating Sociodemographic Biases in Artificial Intelligence-Based Glioblastoma Response Assessment Algorithms

Demographic bias was relatively low in glioblastoma MRI segmentation models. The model trained on the smallest and most homogenous dataset exhibited the most bias. Greater demographic heterogeneity even without increasing training dataset size was associated with reduced bias. The BraTS model, trained on a moderate-sized cohort that included more diverse tumor types, performed better and demonstrated less bias than the FeTS2 model, despite the FeTS2 being trained on the largest dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9217
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Sociodemographic Biases in Artificial Intelligence-Based Glioblastoma Response Assessment Algorithms

Rachel Su Min Lee, Jikai Zhang, Evan Calabrese, Dominic LaBella et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Evaluating Sociodemographic Biases in Artificial Intelligence-Based Glioblastoma Response Assessment Algorithms

Rachel Su Min Lee, Jikai Zhang, Evan Calabrese, Dominic LaBella, Kirti Magudia
article en

Abstract

Demographic bias was relatively low in glioblastoma MRI segmentation models. The model trained on the smallest and most homogenous dataset exhibited the most bias. Greater demographic heterogeneity even without increasing training dataset size was associated with reduced bias. The BraTS model, trained on a moderate-sized cohort that included more diverse tumor types, performed better and demonstrated less bias than the FeTS2 model, despite the FeTS2 being trained on the largest dataset.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.