Sample-efficient active learning for materials informatics using integrated posterior variance

Developing accurate machine learning models with minimal data remains a central challenge in materials informatics. Efficient models can significantly reduce costly computational simulations and time-intensive experimentation by providing reliable predictions of material properties. In this work, we investigate the integrated posterior variance acquisition function within an active learning framework, comparing its performance against three established methods: random sampling, point-wise uncertainty sampling, and query-by-committee. We evaluate these methods across three diverse datasets: AutoAM, Thermoelectric, and NMR. Our results demonstrate that integrated posterior variance consistently outperforms conventional methods in selecting candidates that minimize prediction error with fewer labeled samples. We identify two key limitations: computational overhead that increases with dataset size and diminished effectiveness in high-dimensional feature spaces where distance metrics become less meaningful. Despite these constraints, our approach demonstrates how strategic experimental selection can substantially improve model performance across varying materials informatics domains while minimizing the number of required experiments, offering significant resource savings for materials discovery workflows. • Active learning - Compares Integrated Posterior Variance (IPV) against random sampling, point-wise uncertainty sampling, and query-by-committee. • Multi-dataset evaluation - Benchmarked on three diverse datasets; AutoAM, Thermoelectric, and NMR. • Performance gain - IPV consistently selects candidates that reduce prediction error with fewer labeled samples than other selection strategies. • Limitations - (1) Computational overhead grows with dataset size; (2) Effectiveness declines in high-dimensional spaces where distance metrics degrade. • Practical impact - Enables strategic experiment selection that cuts required experiments for materials discovery workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Materials Science
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2026.114551
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample-efficient active learning for materials informatics using integrated posterior variance

Emad Awad, Said Hamad, Ramsey Issa, Taylor D. Sparks et al.
Computational Materials Science
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Sample-efficient active learning for materials informatics using integrated posterior variance

Emad Awad, Said Hamad, Ramsey Issa, Taylor D. Sparks, Ricardo Grau-Crespo
article en

Abstract

Developing accurate machine learning models with minimal data remains a central challenge in materials informatics. Efficient models can significantly reduce costly computational simulations and time-intensive experimentation by providing reliable predictions of material properties. In this work, we investigate the integrated posterior variance acquisition function within an active learning framework, comparing its performance against three established methods: random sampling, point-wise uncertainty sampling, and query-by-committee. We evaluate these methods across three diverse datasets: AutoAM, Thermoelectric, and NMR. Our results demonstrate that integrated posterior variance consistently outperforms conventional methods in selecting candidates that minimize prediction error with fewer labeled samples. We identify two key limitations: computational overhead that increases with dataset size and diminished effectiveness in high-dimensional feature spaces where distance metrics become less meaningful. Despite these constraints, our approach demonstrates how strategic experimental selection can substantially improve model performance across varying materials informatics domains while minimizing the number of required experiments, offering significant resource savings for materials discovery workflows. • Active learning - Compares Integrated Posterior Variance (IPV) against random sampling, point-wise uncertainty sampling, and query-by-committee. • Multi-dataset evaluation - Benchmarked on three diverse datasets; AutoAM, Thermoelectric, and NMR. • Performance gain - IPV consistently selects candidates that reduce prediction error with fewer labeled samples than other selection strategies. • Limitations - (1) Computational overhead grows with dataset size; (2) Effectiveness declines in high-dimensional spaces where distance metrics degrade. • Practical impact - Enables strategic experiment selection that cuts required experiments for materials discovery workflows.

Computational Materials ScienceVol. 267
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Utah (US), University of Reading (GB), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.