Beyond Chicago: Framing and elevating urban social science

Justus Uitermark argues that the Chicago School of Sociology offers urban studies more than a foil for critical scholarship or a reservoir of cliched biological metaphors. In our response, we concur, but we also highlight the many forms of urban scholarship that align with the Chicago School's emphasis on rich empirical research, analytical abstraction and deductive reasoning – beyond the direct descendants of Robert Park and his mentees. Across the social sciences and applied fields, much of the contemporary literature on cities and urbanization is consonant with the basic approach of the Chicago School while improving upon it through comparative and multi-scalar analysis, greater attention to power dynamics, sharper identification of causal mechanisms and a normative commitment to improving urban life. We frame this diverse work as urban social science and argue for elevating its agenda-setting role in urban studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in Urban Research
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258261416486
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
82.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Chicago: Framing and elevating urban social science

Gregory F. Randolph, Huê-Tâm Jamme
1 citations
Dialogues in Urban Research
Urban Planning and Governance
82.95
article

Beyond Chicago: Framing and elevating urban social science

Gregory F. Randolph, Huê-Tâm Jamme
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Justus Uitermark argues that the Chicago School of Sociology offers urban studies more than a foil for critical scholarship or a reservoir of cliched biological metaphors. In our response, we concur, but we also highlight the many forms of urban scholarship that align with the Chicago School's emphasis on rich empirical research, analytical abstraction and deductive reasoning – beyond the direct descendants of Robert Park and his mentees. Across the social sciences and applied fields, much of the contemporary literature on cities and urbanization is consonant with the basic approach of the Chicago School while improving upon it through comparative and multi-scalar analysis, greater attention to power dynamics, sharper identification of causal mechanisms and a normative commitment to improving urban life. We frame this diverse work as urban social science and argue for elevating its agenda-setting role in urban studies.

Dialogues in Urban ResearchVol. 4(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Arizona State University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Urban Planning and Governance
82.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Chicago: Framing and elevating urban social science — Gregory F. Randolph, Huê-Tâm Jamme · Dialogues in Urban Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS