Real-world evaluation of large language models in detecting drug-related problems: A clinical pharmacist–AI concordance study in hematology care

IntroductionLarge language models (LLMs) offer potential as clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for detecting drug-related problems (DRPs), yet their real-world performance compared to clinical pharmacists (CPs) remains unclear, especially in complex hematology care. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between a clinical pharmacist and three LLMs in identifying DRPs within a Bone Marrow Transplantation unit.MethodsThis prospective observational study evaluated the concordance between a CP and three LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Grok-3, DeepSeek-v3) in a Bone Marrow Transplantation unit. Eighty-three anonymized patient cases encompassing 210 CP-identified DRPs, classified via the PCNE v9.1 system, were presented using a standardized CDSS-simulating prompt. Performance was assessed based on direct detection, prompted detection after structured follow-up, and the clinical relevance of AI-generated therapeutic recommendations against the CP's gold-standard assessments.ResultsDirect detection of intervention-requiring DRPs was limited (51.4%-60.5% across models), with nearly half missed initially. Guided prompting significantly improved overall detection rates to 93.8%-98.1%, with ChatGPT achieving the highest accuracy. All models produced hallucinations. Recommendation concordance with the CP exceeded 70% in most DRP categories. DeepSeek and ChatGPT showed more consistent performance in context-dependent evaluations, whereas Grok demonstrated higher direct detection but lower recommendation alignment. LLMs demonstrate meaningful potential to assist in DRP detection but are not sufficiently reliable as standalone tools. Expert-guided interaction substantially enhanced their performance, underscoring the critical value of hybrid pharmacist-AI workflows.ConclusionFuture research should validate these findings across broader populations with multiple expert evaluators and integrate next-generation AI architectures for safer CDSS implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261418957
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world evaluation of large language models in detecting drug-related problems: A clinical pharmacist–AI concordance study in hematology care

Eren Demirpolat, Neslihan MANDACI ŞANLI, Feyza Gurer, Mahmud Sami Tuncel
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Real-world evaluation of large language models in detecting drug-related problems: A clinical pharmacist–AI concordance study in hematology care

Eren Demirpolat, Neslihan MANDACI ŞANLI, Feyza Gurer, Mahmud Sami Tuncel
article en

Abstract

IntroductionLarge language models (LLMs) offer potential as clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for detecting drug-related problems (DRPs), yet their real-world performance compared to clinical pharmacists (CPs) remains unclear, especially in complex hematology care. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between a clinical pharmacist and three LLMs in identifying DRPs within a Bone Marrow Transplantation unit.MethodsThis prospective observational study evaluated the concordance between a CP and three LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Grok-3, DeepSeek-v3) in a Bone Marrow Transplantation unit. Eighty-three anonymized patient cases encompassing 210 CP-identified DRPs, classified via the PCNE v9.1 system, were presented using a standardized CDSS-simulating prompt. Performance was assessed based on direct detection, prompted detection after structured follow-up, and the clinical relevance of AI-generated therapeutic recommendations against the CP's gold-standard assessments.ResultsDirect detection of intervention-requiring DRPs was limited (51.4%-60.5% across models), with nearly half missed initially. Guided prompting significantly improved overall detection rates to 93.8%-98.1%, with ChatGPT achieving the highest accuracy. All models produced hallucinations. Recommendation concordance with the CP exceeded 70% in most DRP categories. DeepSeek and ChatGPT showed more consistent performance in context-dependent evaluations, whereas Grok demonstrated higher direct detection but lower recommendation alignment. LLMs demonstrate meaningful potential to assist in DRP detection but are not sufficiently reliable as standalone tools. Expert-guided interaction substantially enhanced their performance, underscoring the critical value of hybrid pharmacist-AI workflows.ConclusionFuture research should validate these findings across broader populations with multiple expert evaluators and integrate next-generation AI architectures for safer CDSS implementation.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi (TR), Erciyes University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.