Magma mass increase under Sakurajima Volcano, Japan, inferred from campaign relative gravity and leveling data from 1975 to 1992: an interpretation from volcanic gas studies

Abstract Temporal variations of volume and mass in the magma chambers of Sakurajima Volcano were modeled using leveling and relative gravity data collected around the volcano during the eruptive period from 1975 to 1992, to reveal a physical mechanism for the excessive gravity increase observed at the volcano. The following two deflation sources were estimated from the leveling data: a deeper source of $$(-4.0 \pm 0.3)\times 10^6$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4.0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> m $$^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> /year located at a depth of 7800 ± 400 m beneath Aira Caldera, and a shallower source of $$(-9.25^{\, + \, 1.00}_{\, - \, 0.75}) \times 10^5$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>25</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>0.75</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>1.00</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> m $$^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> /year located at a depth of 4000 ± 400 m beneath the center of Sakurajima Volcano. These deflation sources cannot fully explain the gravity increase of up to 15.75 µGal/year observed at the volcano, because a gravity increase of only $$&lt;3.42$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.42</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> µGal/year is expected from the two deflation sources. After the effect of the deflation sources was subtracted from the observed gravity change, the residual gravity of up to 12.32 µGal/year was then modeled by a point mass increase under the volcano. The estimated rate of the mass increase was $$(4.35_{\, - \, 1.00}^{\, + \, 0.95}) \times 10^{10}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>35</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>1.00</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>0.95</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> kg/year, and the position of the point mass agreed with that of the shallower magma chamber within its error range. This result suggests that the shallower magma chamber gained mass despite the chamber deflation during the 1975–1992 eruptive period. The mass increase can be quantitatively explained by the accumulation of degassed magma in the shallower chamber; the rate of mass increase was calculated to be 1.40 to $$4.65 \times 10^{10}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4.65</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> kg/year using the Rhyolite-MELTS software, by considering the magma degassing and resultant accumulation of the denser degassed magma in the shallower chamber. Our modeling results also suggest the importance of gravimetry in addition to crustal deformation observations in quantifying the rate of magma mass supply, because the magma supply to the deeper chamber was calculated to be $$(+5.24^{\, + \, 1.20}_{\, - \, 1.22}) \times 10^{10}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>24</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>1.22</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-026-02365-3
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magma mass increase under Sakurajima Volcano, Japan, inferred from campaign relative gravity and leveling data from 1975 to 1992: an interpretation from volcanic gas studies

Ryunosuke Kazahaya, Isoji Miyagi, Ryo Oyanagi, Takahito Kazama et al.
Earth Planets and Space
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Magma mass increase under Sakurajima Volcano, Japan, inferred from campaign relative gravity and leveling data from 1975 to 1992: an interpretation from volcanic gas studies

Ryunosuke Kazahaya, Isoji Miyagi, Ryo Oyanagi, Takahito Kazama, Masato Iguchi, Keigo Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Temporal variations of volume and mass in the magma chambers of Sakurajima Volcano were modeled using leveling and relative gravity data collected around the volcano during the eruptive period from 1975 to 1992, to reveal a physical mechanism for the excessive gravity increase observed at the volcano. The following two deflation sources were estimated from the leveling data: a deeper source of $$(-4.0 \pm 0.3)\times 10^6$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4.0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> m $$^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> /year located at a depth of 7800 ± 400 m beneath Aira Caldera, and a shallower source of $$(-9.25^{\, + \, 1.00}_{\, - \, 0.75}) \times 10^5$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>25</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>0.75</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>1.00</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> m $$^3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> /year located at a depth of 4000 ± 400 m beneath the center of Sakurajima Volcano. These deflation sources cannot fully explain the gravity increase of up to 15.75 µGal/year observed at the volcano, because a gravity increase of only $$&lt;3.42$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.42</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> µGal/year is expected from the two deflation sources. After the effect of the deflation sources was subtracted from the observed gravity change, the residual gravity of up to 12.32 µGal/year was then modeled by a point mass increase under the volcano. The estimated rate of the mass increase was $$(4.35_{\, - \, 1.00}^{\, + \, 0.95}) \times 10^{10}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>35</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>1.00</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>0.95</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> kg/year, and the position of the point mass agreed with that of the shallower magma chamber within its error range. This result suggests that the shallower magma chamber gained mass despite the chamber deflation during the 1975–1992 eruptive period. The mass increase can be quantitatively explained by the accumulation of degassed magma in the shallower chamber; the rate of mass increase was calculated to be 1.40 to $$4.65 \times 10^{10}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4.65</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> kg/year using the Rhyolite-MELTS software, by considering the magma degassing and resultant accumulation of the denser degassed magma in the shallower chamber. Our modeling results also suggest the importance of gravimetry in addition to crustal deformation observations in quantifying the rate of magma mass supply, because the magma supply to the deeper chamber was calculated to be $$(+5.24^{\, + \, 1.20}_{\, - \, 1.22}) \times 10^{10}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>24</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mn>1.22</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 78(1)
Kajima Corporation (Japan) (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Geological Survey of Japan (JP), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.