Assessing Team Flow and Its Outcomes in Work Teams: Validation of the Team Flow Monitor and Quick Scan

ABSTRACT Research has shown that flow experiences among groups, such as sports teams and music groups, can positively affect group processes and outcomes. However, there has been limited research on the effects of team flow in the workplace, and existing studies have mainly employed a 37‐item questionnaire, namely the Team Flow Monitor (TFM), as a basis for measuring team climates and coaching the teams to achieve higher‐level performances. Recognizing the need for a more concise instrument, the scientific community seeks a tool that can be easily integrated with other research scales, while practitioners prefer a shorter measure for frequent and convenient assessment. To address this, the present study introduces an 11‐item measure of team flow called the Team Flow Quick Scan (TFQS). In addition to validating this measure against the established TFM, this study seeks to replicate the established findings of team flow. While the TFQS measured team flow using a slightly different model from the TFM, the results are consistent with theory and the slightly restricted ability of an 11‐item measure to have the sensitivity of a 37‐item measure. Ultimately, results replicated the efficacy of the TFM and introduced the TFQS as a viable tool for measuring flow in teams, which can be a powerful aid in helping teams hit their highest performance levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.70037
Primary Topic
Flow Experience in Various Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Team Flow and Its Outcomes in Work Teams: Validation of the Team Flow Monitor and Quick Scan

Orin C. Davis, Siem Buseyne, Jef J. J. van den Hout
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Flow Experience in Various Fields
article

Assessing Team Flow and Its Outcomes in Work Teams: Validation of the Team Flow Monitor and Quick Scan

Orin C. Davis, Siem Buseyne, Jef J. J. van den Hout
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research has shown that flow experiences among groups, such as sports teams and music groups, can positively affect group processes and outcomes. However, there has been limited research on the effects of team flow in the workplace, and existing studies have mainly employed a 37‐item questionnaire, namely the Team Flow Monitor (TFM), as a basis for measuring team climates and coaching the teams to achieve higher‐level performances. Recognizing the need for a more concise instrument, the scientific community seeks a tool that can be easily integrated with other research scales, while practitioners prefer a shorter measure for frequent and convenient assessment. To address this, the present study introduces an 11‐item measure of team flow called the Team Flow Quick Scan (TFQS). In addition to validating this measure against the established TFM, this study seeks to replicate the established findings of team flow. While the TFQS measured team flow using a slightly different model from the TFM, the results are consistent with theory and the slightly restricted ability of an 11‐item measure to have the sensitivity of a 37‐item measure. Ultimately, results replicated the efficacy of the TFM and introduced the TFQS as a viable tool for measuring flow in teams, which can be a powerful aid in helping teams hit their highest performance levels.

Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service IndustriesVol. 36(2)
University College West Flanders (BE), Fordham University (US), IMEC (BE), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche et d’Ingénierie des Matériaux (FR), Columbia University (US), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Flow Experience in Various Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.