Differential returns from networking behaviours for men and women: A longitudinal study

Abstract Networking is an important career self‐management strategy that affects objective and subjective career outcomes. Concerning gender differences, the prevailing assumption is that women benefit less from networking than men. Yet, some findings on the effects of specific subdimensions of networking suggest that although men benefit from most dimensions, women may benefit as much or even more from at least some dimensions. Based on theories of stereotypes and homophily, as well as findings from social network studies, we explore whether internal and external networking have different effects on career outcomes for men and women. Using data from an 8‐year longitudinal study ( N = 229), we employ hierarchical linear modelling to examine how internal and external networking behaviours affect changes in salary and career satisfaction. We find that men's salary growth benefits from internal networking, whereas women's salary growth benefits from external networking. Contrary to our expectations, we find only cross‐sectional, but no longitudinal, effects of networking on career satisfaction. Our findings suggest that men and women might emphasize different forms of networking to maximize objective returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70090
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential returns from networking behaviours for men and women: A longitudinal study

Klaus Moser, Hans‐Georg Wolff
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Career Development and Diversity
article

Differential returns from networking behaviours for men and women: A longitudinal study

Klaus Moser, Hans‐Georg Wolff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Networking is an important career self‐management strategy that affects objective and subjective career outcomes. Concerning gender differences, the prevailing assumption is that women benefit less from networking than men. Yet, some findings on the effects of specific subdimensions of networking suggest that although men benefit from most dimensions, women may benefit as much or even more from at least some dimensions. Based on theories of stereotypes and homophily, as well as findings from social network studies, we explore whether internal and external networking have different effects on career outcomes for men and women. Using data from an 8‐year longitudinal study ( N = 229), we employ hierarchical linear modelling to examine how internal and external networking behaviours affect changes in salary and career satisfaction. We find that men's salary growth benefits from internal networking, whereas women's salary growth benefits from external networking. Contrary to our expectations, we find only cross‐sectional, but no longitudinal, effects of networking on career satisfaction. Our findings suggest that men and women might emphasize different forms of networking to maximize objective returns.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyVol. 99(1)
University of Cologne (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differential returns from networking behaviours for men and women: A longitudinal study — Klaus Moser, Hans‐Georg Wolff · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS