Semantic segmentation of ARPES spectra for electronic dispersion visualization

We address the problem of visualization of the electronic band dispersion from angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy spectra as a semantic segmentation task. The goal is to label each spectrum’s pixel to one of two possible classes. The first class represents the electronic dispersion pixel, and the other one is the “background” (broadening, distortion of the dispersion by intrinsic and extrinsic processes, noises, and the influence of the apparatus function). The models U-Net and DeepLabV3 were applied to this problem. Both models were tested on the experimentally obtained spectra and showed efficiency in electronic dispersion visualization without manual inspection and pre-denoising. The DeepLab network effectively identifies weak zones, but it’s prone to adding artifacts and struggles with highly noisy spectra (regions). In contrast, U-Net is less effective at identifying weak zones, but it doesn’t introduce artifacts and performs better with higher noise levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Low Temperature Physics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0042266
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semantic segmentation of ARPES spectra for electronic dispersion visualization

Yu. V. Pustovit, M. O. Ohloblia
Low Temperature Physics
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
article

Semantic segmentation of ARPES spectra for electronic dispersion visualization

Yu. V. Pustovit, M. O. Ohloblia
article en

Abstract

We address the problem of visualization of the electronic band dispersion from angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy spectra as a semantic segmentation task. The goal is to label each spectrum’s pixel to one of two possible classes. The first class represents the electronic dispersion pixel, and the other one is the “background” (broadening, distortion of the dispersion by intrinsic and extrinsic processes, noises, and the influence of the apparatus function). The models U-Net and DeepLabV3 were applied to this problem. Both models were tested on the experimentally obtained spectra and showed efficiency in electronic dispersion visualization without manual inspection and pre-denoising. The DeepLab network effectively identifies weak zones, but it’s prone to adding artifacts and struggles with highly noisy spectra (regions). In contrast, U-Net is less effective at identifying weak zones, but it doesn’t introduce artifacts and performs better with higher noise levels.

Low Temperature PhysicsVol. 52(2)
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Semantic segmentation of ARPES spectra for electronic dispersion visualization — Yu. V. Pustovit, M. O. Ohloblia · Low Temperature Physics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS