Contrasting Effects of Uncharged and Nitrogen-Charged Chabazite-Zeolite Amendment on Physiology, Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Under Drought

Zeolite amendment to arable soils has been proposed as a promising strategy to improve soil quality and crop performance, particularly under drought. Nevertheless, empirical evidence remains scarce. In this study, we evaluated the effect of uncharged and nitrogen-charged chabazite-zeolite amendment on barley growth, nutrient uptake and physiology (i.e., stomatal conductance, photosystem II efficiency and SPAD) under drought. Barley plants were grown in the greenhouse for nine weeks under optimal conditions before inducing a moderate, 2-week drought period. Our results show that amending soils with uncharged zeolite had no effect on the crop yield and nutrient uptake under water-sufficient conditions. In contrast, applying nitrogen-charged zeolites resulted in significant yield improvements (+90%) and nutrient uptake (+60–90%) as compared to control and uncharged zeolite amendment. Further, we observed a disproportional high uptake of calcium (+260–280%) as compared to other base cations with nitrogen-charged zeolite amendment, resulting in significant shifts in elemental ratios. Both zeolite amendments helped maintain stomatal conductance under drought, while only uncharged zeolite also mitigated declines in photosystem II efficiency under water-limited conditions. Against our anticipation, we observed significant reductions in aboveground biomass (−15%) as well as nitrogen (−20%), phosphorus (−29%) and magnesium (−25%) contents in the treatment receiving uncharged zeolite as compared to the unamended control under drought conditions. This suggests that a significant amount of nutrients must have been immobilized in the zeolite’s mineral structure. Therefore, while nitrogen-charged zeolite amendment represents a promising farming management strategy to improve crop productivity, uncharged zeolite amendment may lead to unintended negative outcomes. Our results highlight the need for further research to evaluate the pedoclimatic factors that determine the agronomic effectiveness of zeolite amendments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16040417
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting Effects of Uncharged and Nitrogen-Charged Chabazite-Zeolite Amendment on Physiology, Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Under Drought

Gerlinde Wieshammer, Christoph Rosinger, Giacomo Ferretti, Hans-Peter Kaul
Agronomy
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Contrasting Effects of Uncharged and Nitrogen-Charged Chabazite-Zeolite Amendment on Physiology, Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Under Drought

Gerlinde Wieshammer, Christoph Rosinger, Giacomo Ferretti, Hans-Peter Kaul
article en

Abstract

Zeolite amendment to arable soils has been proposed as a promising strategy to improve soil quality and crop performance, particularly under drought. Nevertheless, empirical evidence remains scarce. In this study, we evaluated the effect of uncharged and nitrogen-charged chabazite-zeolite amendment on barley growth, nutrient uptake and physiology (i.e., stomatal conductance, photosystem II efficiency and SPAD) under drought. Barley plants were grown in the greenhouse for nine weeks under optimal conditions before inducing a moderate, 2-week drought period. Our results show that amending soils with uncharged zeolite had no effect on the crop yield and nutrient uptake under water-sufficient conditions. In contrast, applying nitrogen-charged zeolites resulted in significant yield improvements (+90%) and nutrient uptake (+60–90%) as compared to control and uncharged zeolite amendment. Further, we observed a disproportional high uptake of calcium (+260–280%) as compared to other base cations with nitrogen-charged zeolite amendment, resulting in significant shifts in elemental ratios. Both zeolite amendments helped maintain stomatal conductance under drought, while only uncharged zeolite also mitigated declines in photosystem II efficiency under water-limited conditions. Against our anticipation, we observed significant reductions in aboveground biomass (−15%) as well as nitrogen (−20%), phosphorus (−29%) and magnesium (−25%) contents in the treatment receiving uncharged zeolite as compared to the unamended control under drought conditions. This suggests that a significant amount of nutrients must have been immobilized in the zeolite’s mineral structure. Therefore, while nitrogen-charged zeolite amendment represents a promising farming management strategy to improve crop productivity, uncharged zeolite amendment may lead to unintended negative outcomes. Our results highlight the need for further research to evaluate the pedoclimatic factors that determine the agronomic effectiveness of zeolite amendments.

AgronomyVol. 16(4)
University of Ferrara (IT), Don State Agrarian University (RU)
Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.