A multi-system psychological capital model for higher education academics: meta-ethnographic research

Introduction Academics in higher education face immense, systemic stressors that challenge their well-being. Current research on Psychological Capital (PsyCap) often treats it as a static, individual trait, overlooking the profound influence of the academic environment. Methods This study addresses this gap by conducting a meta-ethnography of 19 qualitative and mixed-methods studies (2020–2024) from diverse international contexts. It explores how academic PsyCap (hope, efficacy, optimism, resilience) is developed and eroded, utilizing the Multi-System Resilience Model (MSMR) and the Process-Person-Context-Time (PPCT) framework. Results The analysis reveals that PsyCap is not a static trait but a dynamic ecological process. While resources such as mastery experience and collegial support (microsystem) build PsyCap, it is actively depleted by institutional pressures, often manifesting as 'cruel optimism.' This creates a paradox in which individuals are forced to be ‘resilient by themselves' against systemic failures. Discussion Interventions must therefore shift from individual coping to systemic, institutional reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1753121
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-system psychological capital model for higher education academics: meta-ethnographic research

Muhammad Asyraf Che Amat, Anda Wang
Frontiers in Education
Resilience and Mental Health
article

A multi-system psychological capital model for higher education academics: meta-ethnographic research

Muhammad Asyraf Che Amat, Anda Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction Academics in higher education face immense, systemic stressors that challenge their well-being. Current research on Psychological Capital (PsyCap) often treats it as a static, individual trait, overlooking the profound influence of the academic environment. Methods This study addresses this gap by conducting a meta-ethnography of 19 qualitative and mixed-methods studies (2020–2024) from diverse international contexts. It explores how academic PsyCap (hope, efficacy, optimism, resilience) is developed and eroded, utilizing the Multi-System Resilience Model (MSMR) and the Process-Person-Context-Time (PPCT) framework. Results The analysis reveals that PsyCap is not a static trait but a dynamic ecological process. While resources such as mastery experience and collegial support (microsystem) build PsyCap, it is actively depleted by institutional pressures, often manifesting as 'cruel optimism.' This creates a paradox in which individuals are forced to be ‘resilient by themselves' against systemic failures. Discussion Interventions must therefore shift from individual coping to systemic, institutional reform.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.