Prenatal Developmental Toxicity of ARVIDEX® Herbal Medicine in Albino Wistar Rats

Background ARVIDEX® is a polyherbal formulation under experimental development for potential immunomodulatory and antiviral applications. Despite preliminary pharmacological promise, evidence regarding its safety during pregnancy is lacking. This study therefore evaluated the prenatal developmental toxicity of ARVIDEX® in pregnant albino Wistar rats. Methods Fifty pregnant Wistar rats were randomly allocated to five groups (n=10 per group) and administered ARVIDEX® orally at doses of 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg, a human equivalent dose (296.7 mg/kg), or distilled water (control) from gestation day 5 to day 19. Maternal endpoints included body weight variation, feed intake, organ weights, and serum biochemical indices. Caesarean section was performed on gestation day 20, followed by assessment of fetal implantation sites, resorption frequency, number of live fetuses, fetal body weight, crown rump length, and external anomalies. Statistical analysis employed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett's or Tukey's post hoc tests where appropriate. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi square or Fisher's exact test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results The administration of ARVIDEX® produced dose-related maternal and developmental toxicity. Significant reductions in maternal weight gain and food intake were observed at doses of 500 and 1000 mg/kg (p<0.05). These doses were also associated with increased relative liver and kidney weights, indicating possible hepatorenal stress. Fetal assessments demonstrated significant decreases in implantation sites, litter size, crown rump length, and placental weight at higher dose levels. An increase in resorption rates and a reduction in both male and female fetuses were also recorded compared with controls. Conclusion The findings indicate that ARVIDEX® induces dose-dependent adverse maternal and developmental effects at moderate to high doses, while no statistically significant adverse effects were observed for the measured maternal and fetal endpoints at the human equivalent dose. These data underscore the need for further safety evaluation and support caution against the use of ARVIDEX® above the recommended doses during pregnancy until additional evidence becomes available<i>.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103279
Primary Topic
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal Developmental Toxicity of ARVIDEX® Herbal Medicine in Albino Wistar Rats

Daniel Chans Mwandah, Tadele Mekuriya Yadesa, Patrick Engeu Ogwang, Swase DominicTemkimbi et al.
Cureus
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
article

Prenatal Developmental Toxicity of ARVIDEX® Herbal Medicine in Albino Wistar Rats

Daniel Chans Mwandah, Tadele Mekuriya Yadesa, Patrick Engeu Ogwang, Swase DominicTemkimbi, Kiprotich Joshua, Timothy Neeza, Sarah Kyomugisha, Theola R Arisinga, Philbert Katende
article en

Abstract

Background ARVIDEX® is a polyherbal formulation under experimental development for potential immunomodulatory and antiviral applications. Despite preliminary pharmacological promise, evidence regarding its safety during pregnancy is lacking. This study therefore evaluated the prenatal developmental toxicity of ARVIDEX® in pregnant albino Wistar rats. Methods Fifty pregnant Wistar rats were randomly allocated to five groups (n=10 per group) and administered ARVIDEX® orally at doses of 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg, a human equivalent dose (296.7 mg/kg), or distilled water (control) from gestation day 5 to day 19. Maternal endpoints included body weight variation, feed intake, organ weights, and serum biochemical indices. Caesarean section was performed on gestation day 20, followed by assessment of fetal implantation sites, resorption frequency, number of live fetuses, fetal body weight, crown rump length, and external anomalies. Statistical analysis employed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett's or Tukey's post hoc tests where appropriate. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi square or Fisher's exact test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results The administration of ARVIDEX® produced dose-related maternal and developmental toxicity. Significant reductions in maternal weight gain and food intake were observed at doses of 500 and 1000 mg/kg (p<0.05). These doses were also associated with increased relative liver and kidney weights, indicating possible hepatorenal stress. Fetal assessments demonstrated significant decreases in implantation sites, litter size, crown rump length, and placental weight at higher dose levels. An increase in resorption rates and a reduction in both male and female fetuses were also recorded compared with controls. Conclusion The findings indicate that ARVIDEX® induces dose-dependent adverse maternal and developmental effects at moderate to high doses, while no statistically significant adverse effects were observed for the measured maternal and fetal endpoints at the human equivalent dose. These data underscore the need for further safety evaluation and support caution against the use of ARVIDEX® above the recommended doses during pregnancy until additional evidence becomes available<i>.</i>

CureusVol. 18(2)
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (UG), Kampala International University (UG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.