Examining The Rater Reliability of Laboratory Activities of Gifted Students In Science Courses With The Many Facet Rasch Model

In this study, it was aimed to examine the inter-rater reliability of the same performance tasks scored by seven-raters with poster scoring rubrics, science-chemistry laboratory applications performance scoring rubrics, and open-ended achievement test scoring rubrics within the framework of the many facet Rasch model. The participants were 27 sixth grade gifted-students attending BİLSEM selected by criterion sampling from purposive sampling types and seven teachers serving as raters. Density Open-Ended Achievement Test, Poster Scoring rubrics and Science/Chemistry Laboratory Applications Process Performance Analytical Rubric were used to collect data of the study. In the study, FACETS was used for the MFRM, JASP-0.17.2.1 was used for model – data fit analyses and assumption tests. As a result, it was seen that individuals could be distinguished at the group level in terms of ability levels, the items differed in terms of difficulty levels and there was a difference between the raters in terms of severity/leniency. As a result, it was seen that individuals could be distinguished in terms of ability levels at the group level, the items differed in terms of difficulty levels and there was a difference between the raters in terms of severity/leniency except for the open-ended achievement test. It was seen that the scoring based on the three scoring tools distinguished the individuals in terms of ability levels and the items differed in terms of difficulty levels. In the scoring of the poster and experimental performance evaluation scoring tool, scorers numbered six and seven had scoring severity/leniency errors, while no scoring errors Halo effect in open-ended and doing experiment performance scoring were found in all scoring. There were no inconsistent scoring errors in the scoring of the open-ended achievement test, poster evaluation and experiment performances according to the scoring rubric of the density of irregularly shaped solids. Keywords: Many facet Rasch measurement model, gifted students, rater effects

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1585418
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining The Rater Reliability of Laboratory Activities of Gifted Students In Science Courses With The Many Facet Rasch Model

Bayram Çeti̇n, Başak Akar
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Examining The Rater Reliability of Laboratory Activities of Gifted Students In Science Courses With The Many Facet Rasch Model

Bayram Çeti̇n, Başak Akar
article en

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the inter-rater reliability of the same performance tasks scored by seven-raters with poster scoring rubrics, science-chemistry laboratory applications performance scoring rubrics, and open-ended achievement test scoring rubrics within the framework of the many facet Rasch model. The participants were 27 sixth grade gifted-students attending BİLSEM selected by criterion sampling from purposive sampling types and seven teachers serving as raters. Density Open-Ended Achievement Test, Poster Scoring rubrics and Science/Chemistry Laboratory Applications Process Performance Analytical Rubric were used to collect data of the study. In the study, FACETS was used for the MFRM, JASP-0.17.2.1 was used for model – data fit analyses and assumption tests. As a result, it was seen that individuals could be distinguished at the group level in terms of ability levels, the items differed in terms of difficulty levels and there was a difference between the raters in terms of severity/leniency. As a result, it was seen that individuals could be distinguished in terms of ability levels at the group level, the items differed in terms of difficulty levels and there was a difference between the raters in terms of severity/leniency except for the open-ended achievement test. It was seen that the scoring based on the three scoring tools distinguished the individuals in terms of ability levels and the items differed in terms of difficulty levels. In the scoring of the poster and experimental performance evaluation scoring tool, scorers numbered six and seven had scoring severity/leniency errors, while no scoring errors Halo effect in open-ended and doing experiment performance scoring were found in all scoring. There were no inconsistent scoring errors in the scoring of the open-ended achievement test, poster evaluation and experiment performances according to the scoring rubric of the density of irregularly shaped solids. Keywords: Many facet Rasch measurement model, gifted students, rater effects

Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme DergisiVol. 16(4)
Gaziantep University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.