Resource accessibility and depletion assessments: bridging the gap between geospheric and anthropospheric mineral resources

Continuous population growth and the acceleration in energy transition are raising concerns about the accessibility of mineral resources for current and future generations. Traditional methodologies, such as the Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), try to assess it quantitatively but often overlook the dynamic nature of resources. This paper explores mineral resource depletion, addressing misconceptions and uncertainties while proposing pathways forward. The understanding that the concept of resource is intrinsically related to a function is a key starting point for the discussion. The paper navigates the discourse surrounding resources from both physical and economic perspectives, and underscores the dynamic nature of resources, shaped by technological advancements, societal needs, and economic factors. Beyond instrumental and economic values, the paper proposes to look at accessibility as the main value of resources, bringing the focus to resource preservation along their life cycle. Resource accessibility is governed by three aspects (knowledge, ESG permissibility and technical feasibility), underscoring the ability of a system to conserve the recoverability of resources. Instead of questioning how much is left to be exploited, what we do with what we exploit is the core question for sustainable resource management. Essentially, a fairer production system must be conceived by caring for durability (i.e., enhanced lifetime of products) and material functionality (i.e., societal benefits) instead of flows and profit. Any framework for sustainable resource management should be developed under the lens of critical scrutiny of existing economic and production structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mineral Economics
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-026-00599-x
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resource accessibility and depletion assessments: bridging the gap between geospheric and anthropospheric mineral resources

Thomas Drnek, Eric Pirard, João Victor Menezes Cunha
Mineral Economics
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Resource accessibility and depletion assessments: bridging the gap between geospheric and anthropospheric mineral resources

Thomas Drnek, Eric Pirard, João Victor Menezes Cunha
article en

Abstract

Continuous population growth and the acceleration in energy transition are raising concerns about the accessibility of mineral resources for current and future generations. Traditional methodologies, such as the Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), try to assess it quantitatively but often overlook the dynamic nature of resources. This paper explores mineral resource depletion, addressing misconceptions and uncertainties while proposing pathways forward. The understanding that the concept of resource is intrinsically related to a function is a key starting point for the discussion. The paper navigates the discourse surrounding resources from both physical and economic perspectives, and underscores the dynamic nature of resources, shaped by technological advancements, societal needs, and economic factors. Beyond instrumental and economic values, the paper proposes to look at accessibility as the main value of resources, bringing the focus to resource preservation along their life cycle. Resource accessibility is governed by three aspects (knowledge, ESG permissibility and technical feasibility), underscoring the ability of a system to conserve the recoverability of resources. Instead of questioning how much is left to be exploited, what we do with what we exploit is the core question for sustainable resource management. Essentially, a fairer production system must be conceived by caring for durability (i.e., enhanced lifetime of products) and material functionality (i.e., societal benefits) instead of flows and profit. Any framework for sustainable resource management should be developed under the lens of critical scrutiny of existing economic and production structures.

Mineral Economics
University of Liège (BE), RHI Magnesita (Austria) (AT)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resource accessibility and depletion assessments: bridging the gap between geospheric and anthropospheric mineral resources — Thomas Drnek, Eric Pirard, et al. · Mineral Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS